Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

API: add explicit memory mapping #1037

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wfaderhold21
Copy link
Collaborator

What

Adds explicit mapping of user-provided memory for various TLs.

@wfaderhold21
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nsarka @janjust @Sergei-Lebedev @manjugv May be easier to discuss / track updates to API here.

@swx-jenkins3
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@wfaderhold21
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@manjugv @janjust Any comments?

*
* @return Error code as defined by @ref ucc_status_t.
*/
ucc_status_t ucc_mem_exchange_post(ucc_mem_map_mem_h *memh);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wfaderhold21 Is there a need to have an explicit call for exchanging memory handles? Why can't one use allgather or other collectives?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@manjugv Fundamentally, this is an allgather collective. This explicitly has the UCC library perform the operation rather than the User. Is it better to have the User exchange the opaque structure?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the value add, and need for explicit collective call.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@manjugv removed the explicit collective.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants