Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update: append upcoming version to reload versions #1222

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

1715173329
Copy link
Member

Add missing upcoming version to reload versions.

Add missing upcoming version to reload versions.

Signed-off-by: Tianling Shen <[email protected]>
@1715173329 1715173329 changed the title util: append upcoming version to reload versions update: append upcoming version to reload versions Feb 8, 2025
@1715173329
Copy link
Member Author

Oh looks like it already applied, sorry for the extra noise.

@1715173329 1715173329 closed this Feb 8, 2025
@1715173329 1715173329 deleted the ver branch February 8, 2025 13:58
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.18%. Comparing base (5e65dec) to head (e215fa8).
Report is 213 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1222       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   80.75%   91.18%   +10.42%     
===========================================
  Files          15       13        -2     
  Lines         977     1180      +203     
===========================================
+ Hits          789     1076      +287     
+ Misses        188      104       -84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aparcar
Copy link
Member

aparcar commented Feb 8, 2025

Well feel free to suggest more changes. Also I'd be nice if you could ask the immortalwrt community if they could help out with the LuCI app, it's been improvised for a long time since no real JS developer worked on it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants