antiblock: add new package

[karen07]

Maintainer: me
Compile tested: ASUS RT-AX59U 23.05.5, ASUS RT-AX53U 23.05.5, OpenWrt x86
Run tested: ASUS RT-AX59U 23.05.5, ASUS RT-AX53U 23.05.5, OpenWrt x86

Description:
AntiBlock program proxies DNS requests. The IP addresses of the specified domains are added to the routing table for routing through the specified interface.

[mwarning]

@1715173329 hi, do you know why the pipeline is not started here? It says "2 workflows awaiting approval " here. Can you help?

[1715173329]

@1715173329 hi, do you know why the pipeline is not started here? It says "2 workflows awaiting approval " here.

fyi https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs-and-deployments/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks#about-workflow-runs-from-public-forks

By default, all first-time contributors require approval to run workflows.

[karen07]

@1715173329 hi, do you know why the pipeline is not started here? It says "2 workflows awaiting approval " here.

fyi https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs-and-deployments/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks#about-workflow-runs-from-public-forks

By default, all first-time contributors require approval to run workflows.

"The hosted runner: GitHub Actions 17 lost communication with the server. Anything in your workflow that terminates the runner process, starves it for CPU/Memory, or blocks its network access can cause this error."

How can I start again?

[mwarning]

@karen07 I do not think you need to run again. Your package has likely nothing to do with the problem (my pipeline run also tend to be red). Let's wait for a developer.

[karen07]

@1715173329 what is the best way to upload changes so that there is only one commit in the branch?

[1715173329]

Just use amend + force push

[mwarning]

@1715173329 what is the best way to upload changes so that there is only one commit in the branch?

As @1715173329 mentioned. Use git add Makefile --amend and then git push --force.

[1715173329]

Description:
AntiBlock program proxies DNS requests. The IP addresses of the specified domains are added to the routing table for routing through the specified interface.

Please add the description to commit message as well, otherwise LGTM.

[1715173329]

please do not write description just after the commit title (subject), instead, leave a new blank line, then add the description (commit message), and wrap a new line for every 70 chars as well.

it should be look like this:

[1715173329]

After that please allow a few days for other maintainers to leave reviews (if any).

[egc112]

For my understanding, how is this different then e.g. a PBR package which can route domains or IP address through a specific interface?

[karen07]

For my understanding, how is this different then e.g. a PBR package which can route domains or IP address through a specific interface?

My solution is written from scratch in C. It does not entail dependence. It takes up little space. Easy to set up. Uses little RAM. It also has a LUCI-GUI, I'll fill it in later.

You can set the URL to the domains file to the program, which we will send via VPN. You can set the path to the domains file to the program, which we will send via VPN. The URL and File will be re-read every 24 hours.

My configuration example:

config antiblock
	option url 'https://antifilter.download/list/domains.lst'
	option file '/root/my_urls.txt'
	option DNS '127.0.0.1:5060'
	option listen '127.0.0.1:5053'
	option VPN_name 'VPN'

[mwarning]

@karen07 it looks OK to me now. but the package hash is wrong. See pipeline failures.

[karen07]

@karen07 it looks OK to me now. but the package hash is wrong. See pipeline failures.

Yes, I need to upgrade to the git release archive. I will deal with the releases.

[karen07]

@BKPepe @mwarning @1715173329 Is there anything else i need to fix?

[mwarning]

@BKPepe @mwarning @1715173329 Is there anything else i need to fix?

Looks good to me.

[karen07]

@BKPepe Is there anything else i need to fix?

[1715173329]

Merged, thank you!

[karen07]

@1715173329 Thank you very much
How do I get to 24.10?

[mwarning]

@karen07 create a MR based on the openwrt-24.10 packages branch and do "git cherry-pick -x 64f1a28"