Fix part of #5343: Update Incorrect Link for the Oppia Android Code C…

…overage Wiki Page (#5511)

<!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and
check off every point from the Essential Checklist! -->
## Explanation
<!--
- Explain what your PR does. If this PR fixes an existing bug, please
include
- "Fixes #bugnum:" in the explanation so that GitHub can auto-close the
issue
  - when this PR is merged.
  -->

Fixes Part of #5343 

### This PR includes

- Updated the incorrect link reference in the #5483 for the Oppia
Android Code Coverage Page
- Current Broken link:
https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android-workflow/wiki/Oppia-Android-Code-Coverage
- Correct link to wiki:
https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Oppia-Android-Code-Coverage
- Fixed an incorrect SKIP status that triggered even after 'Unit Tests -
Bazel' failure causing it to miscalculate the pb file list as zero
thereby posting a skip comment.
  - Solved by adding an additional condition for the evaluation job.
```
if: ${{ !cancelled() && needs.check_unit_tests_completed.result == 'success'}}
```
- The code coverage comment got triggered even after assignment changes
due to the presence of 'assigned' in the on `pull_request_target`
triggered, fixed it by removing the 'assigned' trigger.
- Utilized 'HtmlEscapers' to escape HTML characters from source code
lines in CoverageReporter.kt as strings those already included html tags
overlapped / conflicted with the report html templates.
- Added limitations section to the 'Oppia-Android-Code-Coverage' wiki
page
- Filed all possible coverage gaps that exist right now based on the
available pass cases.

## Essential Checklist
<!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. -->
- [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If
this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of
#bugnum: ...".)
- [x] Any changes to
[scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets)
files have their rationale included in the PR explanation.
- [x] The PR follows the [style
guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide).
- [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android
Studio
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)).
- [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and
is up-to-date with "develop".
- [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).

## For UI-specific PRs only
<!-- Delete these section if this PR does not include UI-related
changes. -->
If your PR includes UI-related changes, then:
- Add screenshots for portrait/landscape for both a tablet & phone of
the before & after UI changes
- For the screenshots above, include both English and pseudo-localized
(RTL) screenshots (see [RTL
guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/RTL-Guidelines))
- Add a video showing the full UX flow with a screen reader enabled (see
[accessibility
guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Accessibility-A11y-Guide))
- For PRs introducing new UI elements or color changes, both light and
dark mode screenshots must be included
- Add a screenshot demonstrating that you ran affected Espresso tests
locally & that they're passing

.github/workflows/code_coverage.yml

@@ -258,10 +258,10 @@ jobs:
   evaluate_code_coverage_reports:
     name: Evaluate Code Coverage Reports
     runs-on: ubuntu-20.04
-    needs: code_coverage_run
+    needs: [ check_unit_tests_completed, code_coverage_run  ]
     # The expression if: ${{ !cancelled() }} runs a job or step regardless of its success or failure while responding to cancellations,
     # serving as a cancellation-compliant alternative to if: ${{ always() }} in concurrent workflows.
-    if: ${{ !cancelled() }}
+    if: ${{ !cancelled() && needs.check_unit_tests_completed.result == 'success'}}
     env:
       CACHE_DIRECTORY: ~/.bazel_cache
     steps:
@@ -311,12 +311,16 @@ jobs:
   # Reference: https://github.community/t/127354/7.
   check_coverage_results:
     name: Check Code Coverage Results
-    needs: [ compute_changed_files, code_coverage_run, evaluate_code_coverage_reports ]
+    needs: [ check_unit_tests_completed, compute_changed_files, code_coverage_run, evaluate_code_coverage_reports ]
     # The expression if: ${{ !cancelled() }} runs a job or step regardless of its success or failure while responding to cancellations,
     # serving as a cancellation-compliant alternative to if: ${{ always() }} in concurrent workflows.
     if: ${{ !cancelled() }}
     runs-on: ubuntu-20.04
     steps:
+      - name: Check unit tests passed
+        if: ${{ needs.check_unit_tests_completed.result != 'success' }}
+        run: exit 1
+
       - name: Check coverages passed
         if: ${{ needs.compute_changed_files.outputs.can_skip_files != 'true' && needs.code_coverage_run.result != 'success' }}
         run: exit 1

.github/workflows/comment_coverage_report.yml

@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
 name: Comment Coverage Report
 
 # Controls when the action will run. Triggers the workflow  on pull request events
-# (assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened)
+# (opened, synchronize, reopened)
 
 on:
   pull_request_target:
-    types: [assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened]
+    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
 
 concurrency:
   group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.run_id }}

scripts/src/java/org/oppia/android/scripts/coverage/reporter/BUILD.bazel

@@ -15,5 +15,6 @@ kt_jvm_library(
         "//scripts/src/java/org/oppia/android/scripts/common:bazel_client",
         "//scripts/src/java/org/oppia/android/scripts/proto:coverage_java_proto",
         "//scripts/src/java/org/oppia/android/scripts/proto:script_exemptions_java_proto",
+        "//third_party:com_google_guava_guava",
     ],
 )

scripts/src/java/org/oppia/android/scripts/coverage/reporter/CoverageReporter.kt

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 package org.oppia.android.scripts.coverage.reporter
 
+import com.google.common.html.HtmlEscapers
 import org.oppia.android.scripts.proto.Coverage
 import org.oppia.android.scripts.proto.CoverageReport
 import org.oppia.android.scripts.proto.CoverageReportContainer
@@ -277,7 +278,7 @@ class CoverageReporter(
                 """
                   <tr>
                     <td class="line-number-row">${lineNumber.toString().padStart(4, ' ')}</td>
-                    <td class="$lineClass">$line</td>
+                    <td class="$lineClass">${HtmlEscapers.htmlEscaper().escape(line)}</td>
                   </tr>
                 """.trimIndent()
               )

scripts/src/javatests/org/oppia/android/scripts/coverage/RunCoverageTest.kt

@@ -317,7 +317,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(kotlinFilePath)
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(kotlinFilePath)).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(kotlinFilePath)
+      .replace(""", "\"")
+      .replace("&", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -342,7 +348,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(sourceFilePath)
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(sourceFilePath)).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(sourceFilePath)
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -541,7 +553,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(filePath)
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePath)).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(filePath)
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -1880,10 +1898,20 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
     ).execute()
 
     val expectedResult1 = getExpectedHtmlText(filePathList.get(0))
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))).isEqualTo(expectedResult1)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport1 = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport1).isEqualTo(expectedResult1)
 
     val expectedResult2 = getExpectedHtmlText(filePathList.get(1))
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(1))).isEqualTo(expectedResult2)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport2 = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(1))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport2).isEqualTo(expectedResult2)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -1910,7 +1938,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(filePathList.get(0))
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -1937,7 +1971,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(filePathList.get(0))
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -1964,7 +2004,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(filePathList.get(0))
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -2009,7 +2055,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(filePathList.get(0))
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -2036,7 +2088,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
 
     val expectedResult = getExpectedHtmlText(filePathList.get(0))
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -2262,7 +2320,13 @@ class RunCoverageTest {
     </html>
       """.trimIndent()
 
-    assertThat(readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
+    val unescapedHtmlReport = readHtmlReport(filePathList.get(0))
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedHtmlReport).isEqualTo(expectedResult)
   }
 
   @Test

scripts/src/javatests/org/oppia/android/scripts/coverage/reporter/BUILD.bazel

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ kt_jvm_test(
         "//scripts/src/java/org/oppia/android/scripts/coverage/reporter:coverage_reporter_lib",
         "//scripts/src/java/org/oppia/android/scripts/proto:script_exemptions_java_proto",
         "//testing:assertion_helpers",
+        "//third_party:com_google_guava_guava",
         "//third_party:com_google_truth_truth",
         "//third_party:org_jetbrains_kotlin_kotlin-test-junit",
     ],

scripts/src/javatests/org/oppia/android/scripts/coverage/reporter/CoverageReporterTest.kt

@@ -697,7 +697,13 @@ class CoverageReporterTest {
     </html>
       """.trimIndent()
 
-    assertThat(outputReportText).isEqualTo(expectedHtml)
+    val unescapedOutputReportText = outputReportText
+      .replace("&quot;", "\"")
+      .replace("&amp;", "&")
+      .replace("&lt;", "<")
+      .replace("&gt;", ">")
+
+    assertThat(unescapedOutputReportText).isEqualTo(expectedHtml)
   }
 
   @Test

wiki/Oppia-Android-Code-Coverage.md

@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Coverage Analysis: **FAIL** :x: <br>
 
 | File | Coverage | Lines Hit | Status | Min Required |
 |------|:--------:|----------:|:------:|:------------:|
-| <details><summary>MathTokenizer.kt</summary>utility/src/main/java/org/oppia/android/util/math/MathTokenizer.kt</details> | 94.26% | 197 / 209 | :white_check_mark: | 70% |
+| <details><summary>Pass.kt</summary>utility/src/main/java/org/oppia/android/util/math/Pass.kt</details> | 94.26% | 197 / 209 | :white_check_mark: | 70% |
 </details>
 
 ### Exempted coverage
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Certain files are exempt from coverage checks. These exemptions include:
 
 1. **Test File Exemptions:** Files that are exempted from having corresponding test files are also exempted from coverage checks. Since no test files are available for these sources, coverage analysis cannot be performed, and these files are therefore skipped.
 
-2. **Source File Incompatibility Exemptions:** Some files are currently incompatible with Bazel coverage execution ([see tracking issue #5481](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5481)) and are temporarily excluded from coverage checks.
+2. **Source File Incompatibility Exemptions:** Some files are currently incompatible with Bazel coverage execution (see tracking issue [#5481](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5481)) and are temporarily excluded from coverage checks.
 
 You can find the complete list of exemptions in this file: [test_file_exemptions.textproto](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/blob/develop/scripts/assets/test_file_exemptions.textproto)
 
@@ -311,7 +311,19 @@ bazel run //scripts:run_coverage -- <path_to_root> <list_of_relative_path_to_fil
 - <path_to_root>: Your root directory.
 - <list_of_relative_path_to_files>: Files you want to generate coverage reports for.
 
-For example, to analyze coverage for the file MathTokenizer.kt, use the relative path:
+To get the relative path of a file:
+
+1. Navigate to the Project view on the left-hand side in Android Studio.
+2. Locate the file to analyze Code Coverage for.
+3. Right click the file and select Copy Path. To get the path relative to the root.
+
+Alternatively, the coverage report itself provides the relative paths. You can reveal this information by clicking on the drop-down that precedes the file name in the report.
+
+| File | Coverage | Lines Hit | Status | Min Required |
+|------|:--------:|----------:|:------:|:------------:|
+| <details open><summary>MathTokenizer.kt</summary>utility/src/main/java/org/oppia/android/util/math/MathTokenizer.kt</details> | 94.26% | 197 / 209 | :white_check_mark: | 70% |
+
+To analyze coverage for the file MathTokenizer.kt, use the relative path:
 
 ```sh
 bazel run //scripts:run_coverage -- $(pwd) utility/src/main/java/org/oppia/android/util/math/MathTokenizer.kt
@@ -456,6 +468,14 @@ It’s essential to ensure that each source file is directly tested by its own c
 
 ## Limitations of the code coverage tool
 
-1. **Incompatibility with Code Coverage Analysis:** Certain test targets in the Oppia-Android codebase fail to execute and collect coverage using the Bazel coverage command. The underlying issues are still being investigated ([see tracking issue #5481](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5481)), and these files are currently exempt from coverage checks. However, it's expected that all new test files should work without needing this exemption.
+1. **Incompatibility with Code Coverage Analysis:** Certain test targets in the Oppia-Android codebase fail to execute and collect coverage using the Bazel coverage command. The underlying issues are still being investigated (see tracking issue [#5481](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5481)), and these files are currently exempt from coverage checks. However, it's expected that all new test files should work without needing this exemption.
 
 2. **Function and Branch Coverage:** The Oppia-Android code coverage tool currently provides only line coverage data. It does not include information on function or branch coverage.
+
+3. **Kotlin inline functions:** With JaCoCo coverage gaps, Kotlin inline functions may be inaccurately reported as uncovered in coverage reports. (See tracking issue [#5501](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5501))
+
+4. **Line and Partial Coverages:** The current line coverage analysis in Oppia Android is limited and may not accurately reflect the execution of complex or multi-branch code within a single line, reporting lines as fully covered even if only part of the logic within those lines is executed, leading to potentially misleading coverage data. (See tracking issue [#5503](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5503))
+
+5. **Flow Interrupting Statements:** The coverage reports may inaccurately reflect the coverage of flow-interrupting statements (e.g., exitProcess(1), assertion failures, break). These lines may be marked as uncovered even when executed, due to JaCoCo's limitations in tracking code execution after abrupt control flow interruptions. (See tracking issue [#5506](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5506))
+
+6. **Uncovered Last Curly Brace in Kotlin:** The last curly brace of some Kotlin functions may be reported as uncovered, even when the function is fully executed during tests. This issue requires further investigation to determine if it's due to incomplete test execution or dead code generated by the Kotlin compiler. (See tracking issue [#5523](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/issues/5523))

wiki/Writing-tests-with-good-behavioral-coverage.md

@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ Note: For more information on how to utilize the code coverage analysis tool, pl
 
 ## Testing a Single Outcome in Multiple Ways
 
-When testing a single outcome like a successful withdrawal, you can use multiple approaches to verify the if the balance is updated correctly. Here are different ways to ensure the single outcome of withdrawal was processed correctly, each following a distinct approach.
+When testing a single outcome, such as a successful withdrawal, you can use multiple approaches to verify if the balance is updated correctly. Here are different ways to ensure the single outcome of withdrawal was processed correctly, each following a distinct approach.
 
 **a. To verify correctness of output:**
 

wiki/_Sidebar.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
   * Testing
     * [Oppia Android Testing](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Oppia-Android-Testing)
     * [End to End Testing Guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/End-to-End-Testing-Guide)
-    * [Oppia Android Code Coverage](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android-workflow/wiki/Oppia-Android-Code-Coverage)
+    * [Oppia Android Code Coverage](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Oppia-Android-Code-Coverage)
     * [Writing Tests with Good Behavioral Coverage](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Writing-Tests-With-Good-Behavioral-Coverage)
   * [Developing Skills](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Developing-skills)
   * [Frequent Errors and Solutions](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Frequent-Errors-and-Solutions)