-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adresses issue with equality/hashing on module orderings #3400
Merged
fingolfin
merged 8 commits into
oscar-system:master
from
RafaelDavidMohr:rm/mod-ord-equality
Apr 3, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d1607e3
adds == and hash for mod orderings
RafaelDavidMohr 7293be5
remove unneeded method
RafaelDavidMohr ac666f2
add comment for myself
RafaelDavidMohr 64685c2
sketches code for canonical matrix for modules
RafaelDavidMohr 717d130
equality and hashing
RafaelDavidMohr de4e764
cashes canonical matrix
RafaelDavidMohr 9b53d13
adds bug as test
RafaelDavidMohr b52dd72
catch case where we have one generator
RafaelDavidMohr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that == should compare the underlying modules of the orderings as well. And then same for the hash: the field M should be used there as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I completely understand why. If I have two different modules and I want to find out if both share the same ordering, how shall I do that? Note that also for
MonomialOrdering
we do not compare the corresponding rings.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, we should definitely keep it consistent and revert the change here. Sorry for the double work @RafaelDavidMohr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries, it's reverted.