Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup of the work on Oguiso's automorphism #3623

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 18, 2024

Conversation

HechtiDerLachs
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonbrandhorst : This should fix the wrong intersection numbers.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #3623 (97d6776) into master (183cbe6) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 1.36%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3623      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.82%   82.78%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         577      577              
  Lines       77651    77681      +30     
==========================================
  Hits        64312    64312              
- Misses      13339    13369      +30     
Files Coverage Δ
...erimental/Schemes/MorphismFromRationalFunctions.jl 38.53% <3.33%> (-1.74%) ⬇️
experimental/Schemes/elliptic_surface.jl 68.55% <0.00%> (-0.36%) ⬇️

@lgoettgens lgoettgens added topic: schemes experimental Only changes experimental parts of the code labels Apr 17, 2024
@simonbrandhorst
Copy link
Collaborator

It does! Great work.

@simonbrandhorst simonbrandhorst enabled auto-merge (squash) April 18, 2024 10:06
@simonbrandhorst simonbrandhorst merged commit 1303662 into oscar-system:master Apr 18, 2024
26 checks passed
@HechtiDerLachs HechtiDerLachs deleted the oguiso_rebase7 branch April 18, 2024 11:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
experimental Only changes experimental parts of the code topic: schemes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants