[Orderbook]: Tick to price conversion and tests #41
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AlpinYukseloglu
commented
Feb 24, 2024
| } | ||
|
|
||
| pub type ContractResult<T> = Result<T, ContractError>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: borrowed this convention from Pyth's contracts because I found it to simplify things quite a bit.
crnbarr93
reviewed
Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #31
What is the purpose of the change
This PR implements conversion logic for deriving price from a given tick.
Testing and Verifying
All the core functionality is tested in
test_tick_math.rs. The test cases are in parity with the Go tests we have for our tick price conversions in our CL module, which is appropriate since the functionality should be identical.