Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EC-95] Reusable workflows for code review pipelines #97

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

Krusty93
Copy link
Contributor

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@Krusty93 Krusty93 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2024 09:47
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ops label Jan 22, 2024
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

1 similar comment
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@Krusty93 Krusty93 merged commit f9c2c4e into main Jan 22, 2024
6 checks passed
@Krusty93 Krusty93 deleted the EC-95-pipeline-code-review-con-reusable-workflows branch January 22, 2024 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants