Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: The Arbiter fault on behalf of qrix is now auto reset. #23

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

ghalym
Copy link
Contributor

@ghalym ghalym commented Jun 4, 2024

The Arbiter fault on behalf of qrix is now auto reset. The user have to reset only the actual faults on qrix, when those are cleared this summary fault clears as well.

Description

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Where Has This Been Documented?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Pre-merge checklist

  • Code works interactively
  • Code contains descriptive comments
  • Test suite passes locally
  • Libraries are set to fixed versions and not Always Newest
  • Code committed with pre-commit (alternatively pre-commit run --all-files)

ghalym added 2 commits June 4, 2024 11:51
…have to reset only the actual faults on qrix, when those are cleared this summary fault clears as well.
@ghalym ghalym requested review from ZLLentz and jyotiphy June 4, 2024 18:59
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
<SyncUnit Name="tmo" NoDeleteIfUnused="true"/>
<SyncUnit Name="crix" NoDeleteIfUnused="true"/>
<SyncUnit Name="qrix" NoDeleteIfUnused="true"/>
<SyncUnit Name="future" NoDeleteIfUnused="true"/>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't causing a problem, but what is this? Can we document what it is in this PR?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ghalym we should document what this is for in the PR description

ZLLentz
ZLLentz previously approved these changes Jun 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@ZLLentz ZLLentz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code is fine BTW, documentation and gitignore are important too but if you need a merge for PAMM we can follow-up later

@ghalym
Copy link
Contributor Author

ghalym commented Jun 5, 2024

Code is fine BTW, documentation and gitignore are important too but if you need a merge for PAMM we can follow-up later

Thank you. I fixed the gitignore file and ran pre-commit.

@ghalym ghalym requested a review from ZLLentz June 5, 2024 15:58
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

todo: delete file from repo

@ghalym ghalym merged commit 8869f44 into pcdshub:master Jun 5, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants