Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rename ansible-role-nginx to jdauphant.nginx #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

oyale
Copy link

@oyale oyale commented Dec 13, 2022

No description provided.

@perryk
Copy link
Owner

perryk commented Dec 14, 2022

Hi, I really appreciate that you are using this code for your own fork and continuing the development. My use of this code is only occasionally these days so the development is very slow.

Your fork looks to have improved the compiling stages which were a little cumbersome and prone to breaking.

I think my fork of this code likely doesn't need the change to using jdauphant.nginx as this is read-only for a while now. My fork of that repo has a couple of minor changes to work with Oracle Linux 8 however there are other forks plus the official nginx ansible playbooks which would seem like better targets for future development in my view.

This PR can remain open so people can easily include it if this wish, with some luck they will simply pull for your fork directly however.

Best of luck with your endeavours on this. :)

@oyale
Copy link
Author

oyale commented Dec 15, 2022

Hi, @perryk, thanks for taking such good care of the project, that's so nice!

Yes, honestly, the PR was opened accidentally: my initial intention was to merge it against the main branch of my repo. Once it was already open, I considered it was not harmful and decided to leave it open.

For the sake of communicating alternatives to your role, I must add a third one –which I sadly found after developing mine– that supports the official NGINX role. Since jdauphant has stated that the role maintenance is frozen, I agree this seems like a smart move.

@perryk
Copy link
Owner

perryk commented Dec 15, 2022

All good, it is sometimes better to write your own changes and learn how things work too so having your own role is likely still a good thing to have. Perhaps some of the work in third fork which supports the official NGINX role could be useful. Certainly if I ever have a chance to take up further development of this again it is something I would explore.

@perryk
Copy link
Owner

perryk commented Jan 19, 2024

Just a note here, the jdauphant.nginx role is not longer read-only, but it has only 1 commit so is still pretty much the same. I think the role worked well the last time I used it, but if anyone is working on their own for this they still might want to look at the official NGINX role.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants