-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 12 of 12 files at r1.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @karczex)
README.md, line 2 at r1 (raw file):
# pmemkv-tools Optional tools and utilities for pmemkv
update pls
perhaps, if any of this iteration/baseline scripts may be useful we should file an issue in this repo to port it (someday) to proper repo(s). |
README.md, line 2 at r1 (raw file): Previously, lukaszstolarczuk (Łukasz Stolarczuk) wrote…
I was thinking of it, but probably this should be updated as part of name change. |
Any really useful part is storage_efficiency, which was implemented only for ruby - so we may port it there. I mentioned in pmem/pmemkv-java#99, we need such test also in java. |
22ade9f
to
dee9d72
Compare
README.md, line 2 at r1 (raw file): Previously, karczex (Paweł Karczewski) wrote…
I didn't noticed, the name changed in meantime. |
README.md, line 2 at r1 (raw file): Previously, karczex (Paweł Karczewski) wrote…
Done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @karczex)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @karczex)
a discussion (no related file):
hmm.. perhaps update also gitignore file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @karczex)
README.md, line 76 at r3 (raw file):
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=</path/to/libpmemkv.so.1>
that might be a bit misleading - it's not path to the libpmemkv.so but a path to directory in which libpmemkv.so is located
* Bindings code is not compatible nor tested with stable releases. Measurements should be implemented and tested (at least to check building) in each binding repository separately.
dee9d72
to
0b7ac2b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 11 of 13 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @igchor and @lukaszstolarczuk)
a discussion (no related file):
Previously, lukaszstolarczuk (Łukasz Stolarczuk) wrote…
hmm.. perhaps update also gitignore file
Done.
README.md, line 76 at r3 (raw file):
Previously, igchor (Igor Chorążewicz) wrote…
that might be a bit misleading - it's not path to the libpmemkv.so but a path to directory in which libpmemkv.so is located
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r4.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @igchor and @karczex)
README.md, line 74 at r4 (raw file):
If pmemkv is installed in some non-standard path, `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` variable should be set to the directory which contain `libpmemkv.so.1` file
contains
0b7ac2b
to
fa7e2fd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 12 of 13 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @igchor and @lukaszstolarczuk)
README.md, line 74 at r4 (raw file):
Previously, lukaszstolarczuk (Łukasz Stolarczuk) wrote…
contains
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r5.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @igchor)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @karczex)
This change is