-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added tour response for Upgrade and Validate actions, Closes #188 #323
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Added tour response for Upgrade and Validate actions, Closes #188 #323
Conversation
Awesome. Thank you for another awesome contribution. I will review it ASAP |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nicodecleyre Awesome work so far 👏👏👏👏
I tested it and works really good. During my tests and review I noticed some small details we could sort out before we merge 👍
Please do give them a double check 🙏
@nicodecleyre I also did some merging to the dev branch. May I kindly ask you to rebase against latest dev |
@nicodecleyre we just rebased |
aa49dd8
to
67811be
Compare
Still working on it, having a little trouble with the rebase 😆 |
67811be
to
f36347f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nicodecleyre I think we are in a much better state now. I played with it a lot and I think it is a nice feature. I noticed some two small improvements we could double check before we proceed but those are not that important I guess.
What is my main concern, and this is more a question if you experienced the same behavior, is:
when I had both
for validation and upgrade I noticed that sometimes when clicked on the upgrade action even though the tour was generated and the json was present te codeTour extension did not start it but instead it asked which tour should it run and none was available? I was wondering if the tour extension triggered just before the tour json was present 🤔 Maybe we could add a bit of wait as I checked this is already awaited so I am not sure why this behavior and I would need a bit deeper dive on this myself
And then the strange part. When I had the validation tour created first and then I clicked on the upgrade action the extension kicked of the validation tour 😮 instead of asking which tour should be triggered?
I was wondering did you maybe researched if there was a way to pass down to codeTour which specific tour should start, so we could avoid the picker when we have both the validation and upgrade tours? I will try to research this myself as well.
Other than the above concerns/questions I think we are all good and getting closer to get this merged 👍👍I wanted to make this feature perfect before we proceed 🤩. I will try to recheck some of the stuff mentioned above myself next week
if (projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'markdown') { | ||
resultMd = await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'md'); | ||
CliActions.handleMarkdownResult(resultMd, wsFolder, 'upgrade'); | ||
} else if (projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'code tour') { | ||
await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'tour'); | ||
CliActions.handleTourResult(wsFolder, 'upgrade'); | ||
} else { | ||
resultMd = await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'md'); | ||
await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'tour'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was wondering if we could just have if
blocks in which we check for either the specific type/method, like markdown
or tour
and check for both
. In this case we don't need to check explicitly for both
and we will avoid code repetition. What do you think? I guess it should work
if (projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'markdown') { | |
resultMd = await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'md'); | |
CliActions.handleMarkdownResult(resultMd, wsFolder, 'upgrade'); | |
} else if (projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'code tour') { | |
await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'tour'); | |
CliActions.handleTourResult(wsFolder, 'upgrade'); | |
} else { | |
resultMd = await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'md'); | |
await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'tour'); | |
if (projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'markdown' || projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'both') { | |
resultMd = await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'md'); | |
CliActions.handleMarkdownResult(resultMd, wsFolder, 'upgrade'); | |
} | |
if (projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'code tour' || projectUpgradeOutputMode === 'both') { | |
await CliExecuter.execute('spfx project upgrade', 'tour'); | |
CliActions.handleTourResult(wsFolder, 'upgrade'); | |
}``` |
if (fs.existsSync(tourFilePath)) { | ||
await commands.executeCommand('codetour.startTour'); | ||
} else { | ||
Notifications.error('Validation tour file not found. Cannot start Code Tour.'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the error may be misleading as it may not always be the validation tour but also it may be the upgrade tour
🎯 Aim
Adding the tour options and both md & tour options as settings for the upgrade and validate actions
📷 Result
✅ What was done
Md
,Tour
,Both
as upgrade options in the settingsMd
,Tour
,Both
as validate options in the settings🔗 Related issue
Closes: #188