Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docker setup #48

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docker setup #48

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

0xxlegolas
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.


ENV PATH="/root/.foundry/bin:${PATH}"

ENTRYPOINT ["tail", "-f", "/dev/null"]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we remove this since this is being built elsewhere?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need this docker file anymore ?

@@ -12,13 +12,17 @@ PRIVATE_KEY=0xac0974bec39a17e36ba4a6b4d238ff944bacb478cbed5efcae784d7bf4f2ff80
WORLD_ADDRESS=0x8a791620dd6260079bf849dc5567adc3f2fdc318
PLAYER_PRIVATE_KEY=0xac0974bec39a17e36ba4a6b4d238ff944bacb478cbed5efcae784d7bf4f2ff80

#Docker RPC
RPC_URL="http://foundry:8545"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will break the deploy:local script for those that are not on the docker network, right?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible to remove this from the env and pass in with a special deploy:builder_env command. I know its not the nicest approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants