Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lvm_support: update fact to use --no-headings #259

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

b4ldr
Copy link

@b4ldr b4ldr commented Jan 4, 2021

I noticed upgrading that the lvm_vg_#{vg}_pv facts dose not use
the --no-headings switch like the other facts.

This PR adds the --no-headings switch and simplifies the collection

@b4ldr b4ldr force-pushed the pv_name_no_headings branch 2 times, most recently from f175796 to c248f64 Compare January 4, 2021 13:36
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #259 (c248f64) into master (cada6d4) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #259   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.96%   72.96%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines         773      773           
=======================================
  Hits          564      564           
  Misses        209      209           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/facter/lvm_support.rb 76.47% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cada6d4...c248f64. Read the comment docs.

I noticed upgrading that the `lvm_vg_#{vg}_pv` facts dose not use
the `--no-headings` switch like the other facts.

This PR adds the `--no-headings` switch and simplifies the collection
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 1, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants