Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix inconsistency in efficient gini #93

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Fix inconsistency in efficient gini #93

merged 13 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

sjsrey
Copy link
Member

@sjsrey sjsrey commented Jan 16, 2025

This handles #16.

@sjsrey sjsrey added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 16, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.7%. Comparing base (9655a59) to head (5c6ea81).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main     #93     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   66.6%   66.7%   +0.1%     
=======================================
  Files          9       9             
  Lines        560     561      +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         373     374      +1     
  Misses       187     187             
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
inequality/gini.py 94.0% <100.0%> (+0.1%) ⬆️

@sjsrey sjsrey merged commit 0660ce1 into pysal:main Jan 16, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant