-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
prefer infiniband over ethernet #393
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #393 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 61.69% 61.60% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 61 61
Lines 6837 6832 -5
==========================================
- Hits 4218 4209 -9
- Misses 2619 2623 +4
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Sorry guys, Amarel tricked me (or, in other words, I was stupid). Turns out that infiniband is not accessible from the compute nodes either, had to switch to a different interface after all. |
This patch will let RU prefer (the first) infiniband interface over other (ethernet) interfaces.