Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TFA] fix ceph-base package installation issues #4405

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

s-vipin
Copy link
Contributor

@s-vipin s-vipin commented Jan 28, 2025

Issue: ceph-base package installation fails with image RHEL-9.4.0-x86_64-ga-latest
Issue logs: http://magna002.ceph.redhat.com/cephci-jenkins/results/openstack/RH/8.0/rhel-9/Regression/19.2.0-64/rados/62/tier-3_rados_test-location-stretch-mode/Configure_client_admin_0.log

error:
025-01-25 17:22:23,674 - cephci - run:854 - ERROR - yum install -y --nogpgcheck ceph-base returned Error:
Problem: package ceph-base-2:19.2.0-64.el9cp.x86_64 from ceph-Tools requires ceph-selinux = 2:19.2.0-64.el9cp, but none of the providers can be installed

  • conflicting requests
  • nothing provides selinux-policy-base >= 38.1.45-3.el9_5 needed by ceph-selinux-2:19.2.0-64.el9cp.x86_64 from ceph-Tools
    and code 1 on 10.0.203.148

Pass Logs: http://magna002.ceph.redhat.com/ceph-qe-logs/vips/logs_vips_stretch_mode_upgrade_25_01_27_01_58_35/

Description

Please include Automation development guidelines. Source of Test case - New Feature/Regression Test/Close loop of customer BZs

click to expand checklist
  • Create a test case in Polarion reviewed and approved.
  • Create a design/automation approach doc. Optional for tests with similar tests already automated.
  • Review the automation design
  • Implement the test script and perform test runs
  • Submit PR for code review and approve
  • Update Polarion Test with Automation script details and update automation fields
  • If automation is part of Close loop, update BZ flag qe-test_coverage “+” and link Polarion test

@s-vipin s-vipin added RADOS Rados Core tfa-issue-fix TFA automation issue fix labels Jan 28, 2025
@s-vipin s-vipin self-assigned this Jan 28, 2025
@s-vipin s-vipin requested review from a team as code owners January 28, 2025 01:53
Copy link
Contributor

@pdhiran pdhiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Add this label when the PR is good to be merged label Jan 28, 2025
@pdhiran pdhiran requested a review from a team January 28, 2025 04:54
@psathyan
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pdhiran, psathyan, s-vipin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 239d53d into red-hat-storage:main Jan 28, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Add this label when the PR is good to be merged RADOS Rados Core tfa-issue-fix TFA automation issue fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants