-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2307909: Fix disable dr when VR failed validation #372
Bug 2307909: Fix disable dr when VR failed validation #372
Conversation
This reverts commit 70a787f.
use lower version as the hard dependency and use required hard dependency in toolchain as not all the system will have the required golang z version installed Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit b7cba82)
@nirs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2307909, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam. Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@nirs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2307909, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam. Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@nirs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2307909, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam. Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@nirs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2307909, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam. Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@ELENAGER @BenamarMk can you review? |
In newer controller-runtime version 0.19.0 the check for unique controller names. In our tests we are registering the same controller (drcluster controller) several times - in suite_test and in drcluster_mmode_test and in drcluster_drcconfig_tests. As a temporaty solution I added a flag for skipping the unique controller name validation. Another solution can be adding a name as a parameter for SetupWithManager function. Backport notes: - Add missing k8s.io/utils dependency in go mod using `go mod tidy` Signed-off-by: Elena Gershkovich <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 88678f9)
0d73571
to
b284901
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nirs it looks good to me. The commit that was missing was causing my patch to fail as well.
@nirs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2307909, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: keesturam. Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: b-ranto, BenamarMk, nirs, ShyamsundarR The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
e4f039a
into
red-hat-storage:release-4.17
@nirs: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2307909 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This change reverts the revert of the fix and add the missing commit from upstream fixing go version so it can be built with latest downstream go 1.22.5.
This change:
Tested the fix again with vm on drev.