feature: support new plugins api #122
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe updates encompass various improvements and adjustments to the CI/CD pipeline, version upgrades, and configuration changes. Key modifications include incrementing Go and PHP versions, enhancing linter configurations and checks, updating import paths for compatibility with new package versions, and adding scripts for git hooks and pre-commit enforcement. Changes
Poem
Warning Review ran into problemsProblems (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
plugin.go (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationLine range hint
44-44:The functions
DriverFromConfigandDriverFromPipelineare crucial for the plugin's functionality, but there are no direct unit tests found for them. To ensure these methods are well-tested and handle all potential edge cases, especially with the new API changes, consider adding explicit unit tests for these functions.
- File:
plugin.go- Functions:
DriverFromConfig,DriverFromPipelineAnalysis chain
Line range hint
44-44: Review driver construction functions for potential improvementsBoth
DriverFromConfigandDriverFromPipelineare central to the plugin's functionality. It's important to ensure that these methods are well-tested and handle all potential edge cases, especially with the new API changes.Also applies to: 54-54
[observations] The initial script did not return any results, which suggests that there may not be explicit tests for the
DriverFromConfigandDriverFromPipelinemethods.
[analysis] To ensure comprehensive verification, it's important to check if these methods are indirectly tested or if they are covered within other test files.
[actions] We should perform a deeper search to locate any references to these methods within the test files and determine if they are being tested indirectly.
[task review_file_1/3 function_analysis_2/5 sub-task_1/2] Search for references toDriverFromConfigandDriverFromPipelinewithin the test files.[observations] Searching for references within the test files can help identify if these methods are being tested indirectly.
[analysis] We need to use a command that searches for these method names across all Go files, including test files.
[actions] Generate a new shell script to search for references toDriverFromConfigandDriverFromPipelinewithin the Go files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unit tests covering the `DriverFromConfig` and `DriverFromPipeline` methods. # Test: Search for unit tests related to these methods. rg --type go "Test.*DriverFrom(Config|Pipeline)"Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to `DriverFromConfig` and `DriverFromPipeline` within the Go files. # Search for references to `DriverFromConfig`. rg --type go "DriverFromConfig" # Search for references to `DriverFromPipeline`. rg --type go "DriverFromPipeline"Length of output: 499
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumtests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (11)
- .githooks/pre-commit (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/linters.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/linux.yml (1 hunks)
- .golangci.yml (3 hunks)
- beanstalkjobs/driver.go (1 hunks)
- beanstalkjobs/item.go (4 hunks)
- githooks-installer.sh (1 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- plugin.go (1 hunks)
- pre-commit (1 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- .githooks/pre-commit
- .github/workflows/linters.yml
- .github/workflows/linux.yml
- .golangci.yml
- githooks-installer.sh
- go.mod
- pre-commit
- tests/go.mod
Additional comments not posted (5)
plugin.go (2)
4-4: Updated import paths to reflect API changesThe change from
v3tov4in the jobs API import path is in line with the PR's objectives to support the new plugin API. Ensure that all related code is compatible with this new version.
Line range hint
24-33: Ensure robust initialization and error handlingThe initialization function correctly checks for the presence of the plugin configuration and initializes the logger. This is a critical setup step and appears to be handled appropriately.
beanstalkjobs/item.go (2)
14-14: Updated import paths to reflect API changesThis change is consistent with the updates in
plugin.goand aligns with the overall objective of supporting the new plugin API version.
7-7: Updated import path for utility functionsThe addition of the
mapspackage is likely for themaps.Copyfunction used later. Ensure that this package is part of the standard library or a well-maintained third-party library to avoid potential future deprecations or issues.beanstalkjobs/driver.go (1)
12-12: Updated import paths to reflect API changesThis change is consistent with the updates in the other files and aligns with the overall objective of supporting the new plugin API version.
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
tests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/go.mod
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumtests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/go.mod
Reason for This PR
ref: roadrunner-server/roadrunner#1941
Description of Changes
NackWithOptionsoption.License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.][Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]git commit -s).CHANGELOG.md.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
golangci-lint.Updates
v1.59.8.3.github.com/roadrunner-server/api/v4to versionv4.13.0.testsdirectory.Improvements