Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat/chore: Update JSON schema, minor adjustments #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

feat/chore: Update JSON schema, minor adjustments #133

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

nickdnk
Copy link
Member

@nickdnk nickdnk commented Oct 24, 2024

Move init default call to more reasonable place for pool Deprecate num_pollers in schema

Reason for This PR

The pool property was moved from the main repo to its own, where it belongs. This reference needs update.

Description of Changes

Updated pool to reference its repo.
Deprecated num_pollers in schema.
Moved InitDefaults up closer to where it's used.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.

PR Checklist

[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.]
[Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]

  • All commits in this PR are signed (git commit -s).
  • The reason for this PR is clearly provided (issue no. or explanation).
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this PR.
  • Any user-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced clarity in the JSON schema for the RoadRunner jobs plugin, including updated descriptions for various properties.
  • Deprecations

    • Added a deprecation notice for the num_pollers property, indicating future removal.
  • Improvements

    • Updated default behavior descriptions for pipeline_size and consume properties to improve user understanding.
    • Changed the reference for the pool property to a new schema URL for better configuration management.

Move init default call to more reasonable place for pool
Deprecate num_pollers in schema
@nickdnk nickdnk added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces changes to two files: config.go and schema.json. In config.go, the InitDefaults method of the Config struct is modified to streamline the initialization of pool defaults. In schema.json, several properties are updated, including a deprecation notice for num_pollers, clarifications on the pipeline_size and consume properties, and a change in the reference URL for the pool property.

Changes

File Change Summary
config.go Modified InitDefaults method to call c.Pool.InitDefaults() immediately after pool initialization. Removed previous call at the end of the method.
schema.json Updated num_pollers to include a deprecation notice and set deprecated to true. Modified pipeline_size description for default behavior. Revised consume description to clarify item definitions. Changed $ref for pool property to a new schema URL.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: v2024.2 update #129: The changes in config.go related to the Config struct and its initialization logic are relevant as they involve modifications to the configuration handling, which may interact with the pool initialization logic in the main PR.

Suggested labels

enhancement

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Defaults set without delay.
Pools now spring to life anew,
With clear paths and guidance true.
Hopping through the JSON maze,
We celebrate these joyful days! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
config.go (2)

Line range hint 17-19: Add proper deprecation notice for NumPollers

The NumPollers field is mentioned as deprecated in the PR, but the code doesn't properly communicate this to API consumers. Consider:

  1. Adding a proper deprecation notice using go doc comments
  2. Providing migration guidance
  3. Removing the TODO comment once properly documented

Apply this change to the NumPollers field:

-	// NumPollers configures number of priority queue pollers
-	// Default - num logical cores
+	// NumPollers configures number of priority queue pollers.
+	// Deprecated: This field will be removed in the next major version.
+	// The number of pollers is now automatically calculated based on the number of workers.
 	NumPollers int `mapstructure:"num_pollers"`

And update the comment on line 84:

-	// overwrite user value, TODO: deprecate this configuration option
+	// Override user value as this option is deprecated

Also applies to: 84-84


Line range hint 49-53: Inconsistent default values for Parallelism

The code sets different default values for Parallelism:

  • 10 when CfgOptions is nil
  • 5 when CfgOptions exists but Parallelism is 0

This inconsistency could lead to confusion and potentially different behavior based on how the config is initialized.

Consider using a single default value:

 	if c.CfgOptions == nil {
 		c.CfgOptions = &CfgOptions{
-			Parallelism: 10,
+			Parallelism: 5,
 		}
 	}

 	if c.CfgOptions.Parallelism == 0 {
 		c.CfgOptions.Parallelism = 5
 	}

Also applies to: 57-59

schema.json (1)

25-25: Consider consistent number representation.

The description mentions "1 million" while the default value is shown as 1000000. Consider using the same representation in both places for consistency.

-      "description": "Size of the internal priority queue. If the internal priority queue is full, you cannot send (push) additional jobs to the queue. If you set this value to zero or omit it, it defaults to 1 million.",
+      "description": "Size of the internal priority queue. If the internal priority queue is full, you cannot send (push) additional jobs to the queue. If you set this value to zero or omit it, it defaults to 1,000,000.",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b500d49 and a3a9a1a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • config.go (1 hunks)
  • schema.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
config.go (2)

46-46: LGTM: Improved initialization sequence

Moving Pool.InitDefaults() to execute immediately after pool initialization is a good practice that ensures proper initialization order.


Line range hint 61-63: Consider documenting PipelineSize impact

The default PipelineSize of 1,000,000 is quite large. This could potentially lead to significant memory usage depending on the size of the jobs.

Let's check if this value is documented or discussed elsewhere:

Consider:

  1. Adding documentation about memory implications
  2. Making this value configurable through environment variables
  3. Implementing memory usage monitoring for the pipeline
schema.json (3)

31-31: LGTM! Clear description of pipeline requirements.

The updated description clearly explains the relationship between consume items and pipeline definitions, with proper validation constraints.


39-39: Verify accessibility of the new pool schema reference.

The move to a dedicated schema repository is a good practice for modularity.

Let's verify the new schema reference is accessible:

✅ Verification successful

Since the curl command successfully accessed the schema URL and returned a 0 exit code, I can now generate the final response.

Pool schema reference is accessible and valid ✓

The new schema URL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roadrunner-server/pool/refs/heads/master/schema.json is confirmed to be accessible, validating the modular approach of moving the pool property to its own repository.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the new schema URL is accessible
curl -s -f -L "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roadrunner-server/pool/refs/heads/master/schema.json" > /dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "Schema is accessible"
else
    echo "Warning: Schema URL is not accessible"
fi

Length of output: 171


10-17: Properly documented deprecation of num_pollers property.

The deprecation is well documented with both a clear notice in the description and the proper deprecated schema attribute.

Let's verify there are no new usages of this deprecated property:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try another search strategy to verify the usage of num_pollers in the codebase:

This will help us get a comprehensive view of where this property might be used across different file types and contexts.


Let me check the actual content of the files where num_pollers is mentioned to understand its usage:

This will help us understand the implementation details and any recent changes related to this property.


Based on the evidence from the shell scripts, I can now provide a final response:

Deprecation of num_pollers is correctly documented and implementation confirms the change

The deprecation is well-justified as the code in config.go shows that the NumPollers value is now automatically calculated and overwritten regardless of user input:

// overwrite user value, TODO: deprecate this configuration option
c.NumPollers = int(c.Pool.NumWorkers) + 2

While the property is still used in test configurations, these are test files that will be updated when the property is removed in a future version.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any new usage of num_pollers in the codebase
rg -g '!schema.json' 'num_pollers' 

Length of output: 171


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for num_pollers in all files including JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and configuration files
rg -l -i "num_pollers"

# Also check for any test files that might be using this property
rg -l -g "*test*" -g "*spec*" "num_pollers"

# Look for any configuration examples
fd -g "*.yaml" -g "*.yml" -g "*.json" -x grep -l "num_pollers" {} \;

Length of output: 306


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of config.go to see how num_pollers is used
echo "=== Content of config.go ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "num_pollers" config.go

# Also check if there are any recent changes related to num_pollers
git log -p --all --full-history -S "num_pollers"

Length of output: 11864

@nickdnk nickdnk merged commit 08075b6 into master Oct 24, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustatian rustatian deleted the schema branch October 24, 2024 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants