🥅 Re-raise #starttls error from receiver thread
#395
Merged
+15
−8
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes #394. When `start_tls_session` raises an exception, that's caught in the receiver thread, but not re-raised. Fortunately, `@sock` will now be a permanently broken SSLSocket, so I don't think this can lead to accidentally using an insecure connection. Even so, `#starttls` should disconnect the socket and re-raise the error immediately. Failing test case was provided by @rhenium in #394. Co-authored-by: Kazuki Yamaguchi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #394.
When
start_tls_sessionraises an exception, that's caught in the receiver thread, but not re-raised. Fortunately,@sockwill now be a permanently broken SSLSocket, so I don't think this can lead to accidentally using an insecure connection.Even so,
#starttlsshould disconnect the socket and re-raise the error immediately.Failing test case was provided by @rhenium in #394.