Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: address RUSTSEC-2023-0072 #13566

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix: address RUSTSEC-2023-0072 #13566

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rex4539
Copy link

@rex4539 rex4539 commented Mar 8, 2024

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 8, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @epage (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 8, 2024
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Mar 8, 2024

Thanks for the PR! Unfortunately we are currently forced to use an older version. See #13550 and #13179. Closing as we need to wait for upstream changes.

@ehuss ehuss closed this Mar 8, 2024
@epage
Copy link
Contributor

epage commented Mar 8, 2024

We just downgraded openssl because of problems, see #13550

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants