Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update linters to v5 (major) #8159

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 2, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint-plugin-boundaries ^4.2.2 -> ^5.0.1 age adoption passing confidence
eslint-plugin-react-hooks (source) ^4.6.2 -> ^5.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

javierbrea/eslint-plugin-boundaries (eslint-plugin-boundaries)

v5.0.1

Compare Source

  • fix(#​340): Fix bug producing that target option had captured values from the target dependency when templating ${from} property (@​DeyLak)

v5.0.0

Compare Source

Changed
  • feat(#​329): Modify dependencies, tests and docs to support eslint v9
  • chore(#​338): Bump micromatch dependency to 4.0.8
  • docs: Clarify include/exclude precedence in docs (@​robw-mercury)
facebook/react (eslint-plugin-react-hooks)

v5.1.0

Compare Source

v5.0.0

Compare Source

  • New Violations: Component names now need to start with an uppercase letter instead of a non-lowercase letter. This means _Button or _component are no longer valid. (@​kassens) in #​25162

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 13:57
@renovate renovate bot requested review from cngonzalez and removed request for a team January 2, 2025 13:57
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 6, 2025 10:35am
performance-studio ❌ Failed (Inspect) Jan 6, 2025 10:35am
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 6, 2025 10:35am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 6, 2025 10:35am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 6, 2025 10:35am

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Jan 2, 2025

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/[email protected] Transitive: environment, filesystem +10 3.48 MB javierbrea

🚮 Removed packages: npm/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 6, 2025 10:21 AM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 5s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 38s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 51s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 28s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 39s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 06 Jan 2025 10:23:49 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 25.6 efps (39ms) 25.6 efps (39ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (body) 56.0 efps (18ms) 47.1 efps (21ms) +3ms (+19.0%)
article (string inside object) 27.4 efps (37ms) 28.6 efps (35ms) -2ms (-4.1%)
article (string inside array) 25.6 efps (39ms) 23.8 efps (42ms) +3ms (+7.7%)
synthetic (title) 20.4 efps (49ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.4 efps (49ms) 21.3 efps (47ms) -2ms (-4.1%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 47ms 71ms 537ms 844ms 10.7s
article (body) 18ms 20ms 33ms 182ms 201ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 37ms 39ms 45ms 279ms 268ms 6.9s
article (string inside array) 39ms 43ms 48ms 83ms 128ms 6.8s
synthetic (title) 49ms 51ms 55ms 260ms 448ms 12.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 49ms 56ms 69ms 421ms 872ms 8.6s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 45ms 60ms 366ms 720ms 11.5s
article (body) 21ms 26ms 56ms 179ms 364ms 6.4s
article (string inside object) 35ms 37ms 40ms 74ms 0ms 6.1s
article (string inside array) 42ms 48ms 54ms 191ms 396ms 7.6s
synthetic (title) 49ms 51ms 59ms 263ms 450ms 12.1s
synthetic (string inside object) 47ms 50ms 59ms 280ms 381ms 7.6s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@stipsan
Copy link
Member

stipsan commented Jan 8, 2025

close for now to stop it from using github and vercel build queue resources

@stipsan stipsan closed this Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update. You will not get PRs for any future 5.x releases. But if you manually upgrade to 5.x then Renovate will re-enable minor and patch updates automatically.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.

@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/major-5-linters branch January 8, 2025 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant