Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SCP-85 Input sbom.json by default #18

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024
Merged

SCP-85 Input sbom.json by default #18

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

isasmendiagus
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

SCANOSS Summary 🚀

Licenses detected: 10

License Copyleft URL
MIT https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
Apache-2.0
ISC
BSD-3-Clause
Python-2.0
BSD-2-Clause
CC0-1.0
MPL-2.0
CC-BY-4.0
0BSD

francostramana
francostramana requested changes Jan 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@francostramana francostramana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code seems to be perfect, all that remains is to fix linter errors

@isasmendiagus isasmendiagus force-pushed the SCP-85-input-sbom.json-by-default branch from c4fba0b to c47f14c Compare January 31, 2024 09:53
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

SCANOSS Summary 🚀

Licenses detected: 10

License Copyleft URL
MIT https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
Apache-2.0
ISC
BSD-3-Clause
Python-2.0
BSD-2-Clause
CC0-1.0
MPL-2.0
CC-BY-4.0
0BSD

@isasmendiagus isasmendiagus merged commit 2e98329 into main Jan 31, 2024
16 checks passed
@isasmendiagus isasmendiagus deleted the SCP-85-input-sbom.json-by-default branch January 31, 2024 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@francostramana francostramana francostramana requested changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@isasmendiagus @francostramana