-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: UUI-814 fix crash for lateinit instance property #107
Merged
pklawikowski-schibsted
merged 4 commits into
master
from
feature/UUI-814-fix-auth-result-crash
Aug 28, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c3013fc
fix: UUI-814
pklawikowski-schibsted f327330
Merge branch 'master' into feature/UUI-814-fix-auth-result-crash
pklawikowski-schibsted 4d68633
Merge branch 'master' into feature/UUI-814-fix-auth-result-crash
pklawikowski-schibsted 52a23f9
Merge branch 'master' into feature/UUI-814-fix-auth-result-crash
pklawikowski-schibsted File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey, this change will be considered a breaking change right? since get will now require a mandatory client param
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think this approach will also strongly link AuthResultLiveData to Client? i think currently AuthResultLiveData has indirect dependency to Client through AuthorizationManagementActivity
I am not sure but also this might allow app users to change used Auth client during app lifecycle if client is missing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically no, because the only place where devs are passing client inside SDK logic to configure itself is via
AuthorizationManagementActivity.setup
From what I see, places where we are using
AuthResultLiveData.get()
are leveraged only inOnResume
flow, which is totally internal logic.AuthResultLiveData.getIfInitialised()
is a safe getter used inUser
class.I guess we dont want to allow users to use nullable variables, to maybe lets change the visibility of
get(client)
to prevent brands using non-safe method? If they really really need the AuthLiveData which is served throughUser
client I dont see a reason to expose theget(client)
method and make only an internal use?