Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ta_pipelines+adding_unit_tests #128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JasonPowr
Copy link

No description provided.

@JasonPowr
Copy link
Author

/hold

@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the ta_pipelines+adding_unit_tests branch 11 times, most recently from cad8eea to 94ff763 Compare August 28, 2024 11:40
@SequeI SequeI self-assigned this Aug 28, 2024
Copy link

@SequeI SequeI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Aug 28, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JasonPowr, SequeI
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign cooktheryan for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the ta_pipelines+adding_unit_tests branch from 94ff763 to 4cde79a Compare August 28, 2024 13:29
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Aug 28, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 28, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@JasonPowr
Copy link
Author

/unhold

@JasonPowr JasonPowr merged commit 5e88f6c into main Aug 28, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants