Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More work on actions #622

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

justin808
Copy link
Member

@justin808 justin808 commented Jan 28, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced GitHub Action to support optional issue/PR number specification.
    • Added flexible input mechanism for help command workflow.
    • Introduced required input parameters for deploying to the Control Plane, including Control Plane token and Pull Request number.
    • Added new event triggers for deployment workflows, allowing for manual deployments and deployments from any branch except main and master.
    • Added comprehensive guide on developing and testing GitHub Actions, focusing on workflows triggered by comments.
  • Chores

    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use specific action version.
    • Improved input parameter handling for help commands.
    • Streamlined deployment process and environment variable handling in workflows.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces an optional issue-number input parameter to the GitHub Actions help command workflow and action. This enhancement allows users to explicitly specify the pull request or issue number for posting comments, with a fallback mechanism to use the event context when no number is provided. Additionally, new required input parameters for the deployment action are added, enhancing its configurability. The workflow configuration and action definitions have been updated to support these changes, improving the overall flexibility of comment targeting and deployment processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/actions/help-command/action.yml Added optional issue-number input parameter, modified logic to determine issue number, updated to use actions/github-script@v7
.github/workflows/help-command.yml Added issue-number input to workflow_dispatch, updated action reference, configured input passing
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml Added required input parameters cpln_token and pr_number, updated environment variable handling
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml Added push and workflow_dispatch triggers, updated environment variables for application name and PR number, added job step for PR HEAD Ref
.github/readme.md Added comprehensive guide on developing and testing GitHub Actions, focusing on testing workflows triggered by comments on pull requests.
.github/actions/setup-environment/action.yml Updated Control Plane CLI installation version from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1

Possibly related PRs

  • Improvements to deployments #615: This PR introduces changes to the deployment process, including the addition of input parameters related to pull requests, which aligns with the main PR's focus on adding an issue-number parameter for specifying pull requests or issues.
  • delete-on-pr-close #617: This PR modifies workflows to include commands related to deploying review apps, which is relevant to the main PR's changes that enhance the help command for managing deployments.
  • Github actions fixes #618: This PR includes updates to the deployment workflow, specifically adding validation for required secrets and restructuring deployment steps, which relates to the main PR's changes in handling issue numbers and deployment logic.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code, a rabbit hops,
With issue numbers, the comment drops!
Deployments dance, with tokens in tow,
Flexibility blooms, watch the workflows grow!
A joyful leap, as changes take flight,
In GitHub's garden, everything feels right! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Hi 👋 Here are the commands available for this PR:

  • /deploy-review-app: Deploy your changes to a review environment
  • /delete-review-app: Clean up the review environment when you're done
  • /help: Show detailed information about all commands

Use /help to see full documentation, including configuration options.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

✅ Deployment complete for PR #622, commit 9b3ba09

🚀 Review App for PR #622
🎮 Control Plane Console

📋 View Completed Action Build and Deploy Logs

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from 9b3ba09 to 89e005d Compare January 28, 2025 05:34
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

✅ Deployment complete for PR #622, commit 89e005d

🚀 Review App for PR #622
🎮 Control Plane Console

📋 View Completed Action Build and Deploy Logs

@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/help

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6add086 and 89e005d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/actions/help-command/action.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/help-command.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/actions/help-command/action.yml

[error] 86-86: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (1)

10-14: LGTM! Well-structured input parameter definition.

The new issue-number input parameter is properly defined with appropriate type, description, and required flag.

.github/actions/help-command/action.yml (2)

8-10: LGTM! Well-defined optional input parameter.

The issue-number input parameter is properly defined with clear description and appropriate optionality.


16-16: LGTM! Good practice using pinned version.

Using a specific version (@v7) of actions/github-script improves stability and predictability.

@@ -26,6 +31,7 @@ jobs:
uses: actions/checkout

- name: Show Help Information
uses: ./.github/actions/help-command
uses: shakacode/shared-actions/help-command@justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid using feature branch references in production workflows.

The action reference @justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 points to a feature branch, which could lead to instability. Consider using a stable version tag or commit SHA.

-        uses: shakacode/shared-actions/help-command@justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2
+        uses: shakacode/shared-actions/help-command@v1

Also applies to: 37-37

Comment on lines +86 to +93
const issueNumber = inputs['issue-number'] ||
(context.eventName === 'issue_comment' ? context.payload.issue.number : null);

if (issueNumber) {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
issue_number: issueNumber,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling and fix trailing space.

  1. Fix the trailing space on line 86.
  2. Consider adding explicit error handling when issueNumber is null in non-comment contexts.
-          const issueNumber = inputs['issue-number'] || 
+          const issueNumber = inputs['issue-number'] ||
           (context.eventName === 'issue_comment' ? context.payload.issue.number : null);

-          if (issueNumber) {
+          if (!issueNumber) {
+            core.warning('No issue number provided or found in context. Falling back to console output.');
+            console.log(helpText);
+          } else {
             await github.rest.issues.createComment({
               owner: context.repo.owner,
               repo: context.repo.repo,
               issue_number: issueNumber,
               body: helpText
             });
-          } else {
-            console.log(helpText);
           }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const issueNumber = inputs['issue-number'] ||
(context.eventName === 'issue_comment' ? context.payload.issue.number : null);
if (issueNumber) {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
issue_number: issueNumber,
const issueNumber = inputs['issue-number'] ||
(context.eventName === 'issue_comment' ? context.payload.issue.number : null);
if (!issueNumber) {
core.warning('No issue number provided or found in context. Falling back to console output.');
console.log(helpText);
} else {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issueNumber,
body: helpText
});
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 86-86: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from bca8d6e to f0c999b Compare January 28, 2025 07:36
@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from f0c999b to 9ae70fb Compare January 28, 2025 07:38
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

✅ Deployment complete for PR #622, commit 9ae70fb

🚀 Review App for PR #622
🎮 Control Plane Console

📋 View Completed Action Build and Deploy Logs

Copy link

🚀 Deploying Review App...

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🚀 Deploying to Control Plane...

⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready...

📝 View Deploy Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

🚀 Deploying Review App...

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🚀 Deploying to Control Plane...

⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready...

📝 View Deploy Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/readme.md (1)

1-85: Comprehensive documentation with minor formatting issues.

The documentation provides valuable insights into GitHub Actions development and testing. However, there are formatting inconsistencies.

Replace hard tabs with spaces for consistent formatting:

-	1.	Push on a Branch:
-	•	When you push changes to a branch (e.g., feature-branch), GitHub Actions uses the workflow files in that same branch.
+    1. Push on a Branch:
+    • When you push changes to a branch (e.g., feature-branch), GitHub Actions uses the workflow files in that same branch.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

10-10: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


10-10: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


11-11: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


11-11: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


12-12: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


12-12: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


13-13: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


13-13: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


14-14: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


14-14: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


15-15: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


15-15: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


20-20: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


20-20: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


21-21: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


21-21: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


28-28: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


28-28: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


29-29: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


29-29: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


36-36: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


36-36: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


37-37: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


37-37: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


38-38: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


38-38: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


45-45: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


45-45: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


63-63: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


63-63: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


71-71: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


71-71: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


72-72: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


72-72: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


75-75: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


75-75: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


76-76: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


76-76: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


79-79: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


79-79: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


80-80: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


80-80: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


83-83: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


83-83: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


84-84: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


84-84: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


85-85: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


85-85: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89e005d and 45b512c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/readme.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (7 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/help-command.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml

[error] 37-37: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

[error] 80-80: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 141-141: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 144-144: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 145-145: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/readme.md

10-10: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


10-10: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


11-11: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


11-11: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


12-12: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


12-12: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


13-13: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


13-13: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


14-14: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


14-14: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


15-15: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


15-15: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


20-20: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


20-20: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


21-21: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


21-21: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


28-28: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


28-28: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


29-29: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


29-29: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


36-36: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


36-36: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


37-37: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


37-37: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


38-38: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


38-38: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


45-45: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


45-45: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


63-63: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


63-63: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


71-71: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


71-71: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


72-72: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


72-72: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


75-75: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


75-75: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


76-76: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


76-76: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


79-79: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


79-79: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


80-80: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


80-80: Hard tabs
Column: 3

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


83-83: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


83-83: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


84-84: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


84-84: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


85-85: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


85-85: Hard tabs
Column: 4

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

115-115: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Process-Deployment-Command
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (2)

10-14: LGTM: Well-structured input parameter addition.

The new issue-number input parameter is well-defined with clear description, type, and required flag.


33-37: Verify input parameter usage and update action reference.

The action reference points to a feature branch, which was previously flagged as a potential issue.

Let's verify the input parameter usage:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the issue-number input parameter usage in the action

# Search for usage of the issue-number parameter
ast-grep --pattern 'github.event.inputs.issue-number'
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 37-37: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (2)

20-25: LGTM: Well-structured required input parameters.

The new cpln_token and pr_number inputs are properly defined with clear descriptions and required flags.


64-66: LGTM: Proper environment variable configuration.

Environment variables are correctly configured to use the new input parameters.

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (4)

8-12: LGTM: Well-structured branch filtering.

The push event configuration properly excludes main and master branches while allowing deployments from feature branches.


15-20: LGTM: Well-defined workflow dispatch input.

The PR number input for manual triggers is properly defined with clear description and type.


49-89: LGTM: Robust PR reference handling.

The PR reference handling is comprehensive, covering all event types and edge cases.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 80-80: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


283-284: LGTM: Proper input parameter usage.

The new required inputs are correctly passed to the deploy action.

Comment on lines 113 to 125
- name: Validate Deployment Request
id: validate
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "pull_request" && "${{ steps.check-app.outputs.app_exists }}" == "true" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "workflow_dispatch" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == "/deploy-review-app" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "push" ]]; then
echo "SHOULD_DEPLOY=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV
else
echo "SHOULD_DEPLOY=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
echo "Skipping deployment - not a valid trigger (event: ${{ github.event_name }})"
exit 0
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Security: Avoid using untrusted input directly in scripts.

The validation step uses github.event.comment.body directly in the script, which is potentially unsafe.

Modify the validation to use an environment variable:

       - name: Validate Deployment Request
         id: validate
+        env:
+          COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
         run: |
           if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "pull_request" && "${{ steps.check-app.outputs.app_exists }}" == "true" ]] || \
              [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "workflow_dispatch" ]] || \
-             [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == "/deploy-review-app" ]] || \
+             [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "$COMMENT_BODY" == "/deploy-review-app" ]] || \
              [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "push" ]]; then
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Validate Deployment Request
id: validate
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "pull_request" && "${{ steps.check-app.outputs.app_exists }}" == "true" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "workflow_dispatch" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == "/deploy-review-app" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "push" ]]; then
echo "SHOULD_DEPLOY=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV
else
echo "SHOULD_DEPLOY=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
echo "Skipping deployment - not a valid trigger (event: ${{ github.event_name }})"
exit 0
fi
- name: Validate Deployment Request
id: validate
env:
COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "pull_request" && "${{ steps.check-app.outputs.app_exists }}" == "true" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "workflow_dispatch" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "$COMMENT_BODY" == "/deploy-review-app" ]] || \
[[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "push" ]]; then
echo "SHOULD_DEPLOY=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV
else
echo "SHOULD_DEPLOY=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
echo "Skipping deployment - not a valid trigger (event: ${{ github.event_name }})"
exit 0
fi
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

115-115: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from 27d1750 to 288fade Compare January 28, 2025 08:32
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from 288fade to 6ce1f76 Compare January 28, 2025 08:37
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from 6ce1f76 to 445c109 Compare January 28, 2025 08:39
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from 445c109 to c8c9df3 Compare January 28, 2025 08:47
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch 2 times, most recently from f548d2a to 3e2b20c Compare January 28, 2025 08:54
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🏗️ Building Docker image for PR #622, commit
🏗️ Building Docker image...

📝 View Build Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console

@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch 2 times, most recently from ddc379a to c6d9fd0 Compare January 28, 2025 09:10
@justin808 justin808 force-pushed the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch from c6d9fd0 to 5c8d3dc Compare January 28, 2025 09:11
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/actions/setup-environment/action.yml (1)

25-28: Consider using version variables for better maintainability.

While the version updates are good, consider extracting versions to variables at the workflow level for easier maintenance. This would make it simpler to update versions across multiple workflows.

-        sudo npm install -g @controlplane/[email protected]
-        cpln --version
-        gem install cpflow -v 4.1.0
-        cpflow --version
+        CLI_VERSION="3.3.1"
+        CPFLOW_VERSION="4.1.0"
+        sudo npm install -g "@controlplane/cli@${CLI_VERSION}"
+        cpln --version
+        gem install cpflow -v "${CPFLOW_VERSION}"
+        cpflow --version
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (3)

8-12: Consider adding branch protection pattern.

The branch exclusion pattern is good, but consider using a more specific inclusion pattern to limit deployments to feature branches only.

-      - '**'        # Any branch
-      - '!main'     # Except main
-      - '!master'   # Except master
+      - 'feature/**'    # Only feature branches
+      - 'bugfix/**'     # Only bugfix branches

169-184: Consider caching workflow URL lookup.

The workflow URL lookup could be cached to avoid redundant API calls in subsequent steps.

       - name: Set Deployment URLs
         id: set-urls
         if: env.DO_DEPLOY != 'false'
         uses: actions/github-script@v7
         with:
           script: |
             // Set workflow URL for logs
             const getWorkflowUrl = async (runId) => {
               const { data: run } = await github.rest.actions.getWorkflowRun({
                 owner: context.repo.owner,
                 repo: context.repo.repo,
                 run_id: runId
               });
               return run.html_url;
             };
             
-            const workflowUrl = await getWorkflowUrl(context.runId);
+            // Cache the workflow URL to avoid redundant API calls
+            const workflowUrl = core.getState('workflow_url') || await getWorkflowUrl(context.runId);
+            if (!core.getState('workflow_url')) {
+              core.saveState('workflow_url', workflowUrl);
+            }
             
             core.exportVariable('WORKFLOW_URL', workflowUrl);
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 178-178: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 181-181: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 182-182: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


86-86: Fix trailing whitespace issues.

There are trailing whitespace issues in multiple lines that should be removed.

Also applies to: 91-91, 95-95, 178-178, 181-181, 182-182, 198-198, 233-233

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 86-86: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45b512c and 5c8d3dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/actions/setup-environment/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (4 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/help-command.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

69-69: property "pr" is not defined in object type {pr_number: string}

(expression)


142-142: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)


190-190: property "create-comment" is not defined in object type {check-app: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}; getref: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}; set-urls: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: object}; validate: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}

(expression)


223-223: property "create-comment" is not defined in object type {check-app: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}; getref: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}; set-urls: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: object}; validate: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}

(expression)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

[error] 86-86: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 91-91: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 95-95: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 178-178: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 181-181: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 182-182: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 198-198: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 233-233: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/help-command.yml

[error] 37-37: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (2)

10-14: LGTM! Well-structured input parameter definition.

The new issue-number input parameter is properly defined with appropriate type, requirement flag, and clear description.


33-37: LGTM! Good use of local action reference.

The action reference and parameter passing are correctly implemented. Using a local action path is a good practice for maintaining version control.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 37-37: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (2)

66-104: LGTM! Robust PR reference handling.

The PR reference handling is well-implemented with:

  • Comprehensive event type handling
  • Proper error handling
  • Clear environment variable management
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

69-69: property "pr" is not defined in object type {pr_number: string}

(expression)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 86-86: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 91-91: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 95-95: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


139-148: ⚠️ Potential issue

Security: Avoid using untrusted input directly in scripts.

The validation step uses github.event.comment.body directly in the script, which is potentially unsafe.

       - name: Validate Deployment Request
         id: validate
         if: env.DO_DEPLOY != 'false'
+        env:
+          COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
         run: |
           if ! [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "workflow_dispatch" || \
-                 ("${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == "/deploy-review-app") || \
+                 ("${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "$COMMENT_BODY" == "/deploy-review-app") || \
                 "${{ github.event_name }}" == "pull_request" ]]; then

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

142-142: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)

@justin808 justin808 merged commit ebbc8d8 into master Jan 28, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@justin808 justin808 deleted the justin808-more-work-on-review-apps-2 branch January 28, 2025 09:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant