Github Actions Promote #625
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflows for promoting staging to production and updating help commands. A new job named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hi 👋 Here are the commands available for this PR:
Use |
🚀 Quick Review App CommandsWelcome! Here are the commands you can use in this PR:
|
|
/help |
Available Commands
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (1)
Line range hint
44-55: Add error handling to release creation step.While the promotion step has proper error handling, the release creation step could benefit from similar error handling to ensure failures are clearly reported.
Consider updating the release creation step:
- name: Create GitHub Release if: success() env: GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} run: | # Get the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format RELEASE_DATE=$(date '+%Y-%m-%d') # Create a release tag RELEASE_TAG="production-${RELEASE_DATE}" # Create GitHub release + if ! \ gh release create "${RELEASE_TAG}" \ --title "Production Release ${RELEASE_DATE}" \ - --notes "🚀 Production deployment on ${RELEASE_DATE}" + --notes "🚀 Production deployment on ${RELEASE_DATE}"; then + echo "❌ Failed to create GitHub release" + exit 1 + fi + + echo "✅ Successfully created GitHub release ${RELEASE_TAG}"🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (2)
17-20: LGTM! Environment variables now use production-specific secrets.The changes improve security and maintainability by:
- Using environment-specific organization secrets
- Making the app name configurable via variables
- Using clearly named production tokens
34-34: LGTM! Improved logging with app name.The echo message now clearly identifies which app is being promoted, improving observability.
| UPSTREAM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.STAGING_TOKEN }} | ||
| APP_NAME: ${{ vars.PRODUCTION_APP_NAME }} | ||
| CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION }} | ||
| CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Resolve CPLN_TOKEN inconsistency.
There are two different CPLN_TOKEN references:
- Line 19:
CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION }} - Line 29:
CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN }}
This could lead to confusion or errors.
Update line 29 to use the production token:
uses: ./.github/actions/setup-environment
env:
- CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN }}
+ CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION }}Also applies to: 29-29
justin808
force-pushed
the
justin808-2
branch
from
662be14 to
f4e59c5
Compare
justin808
force-pushed
the
justin808-2
branch
from
f4e59c5 to
eeabd9c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml
[error] 20-20: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 26-26: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (4)
22-25: LGTM! Good security practices in environment configuration.
- Using separate tokens for staging and production environments
- Moving non-sensitive values to variables instead of secrets
- Clear naming convention with
_PRODUCTIONsuffix
33-35: LGTM! Improved action configuration syntax.The change from
envtowithsyntax is more explicit and better aligns with GitHub Actions best practices.
40-40: LGTM! Enhanced logging with app name.Adding the app name to the log message improves observability.
12-16: Verify the external debug workflow file exists.The workflow references
./.github/workflows/debug-workflow.yml. Please ensure this file exists and is properly configured.✅ Verification successful
External debug workflow exists and is properly configured ✅
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the debug workflow file exists if [ -f .github/workflows/debug-workflow.yml ]; then echo "Debug workflow file exists" cat .github/workflows/debug-workflow.yml else echo "Debug workflow file not found" fiLength of output: 1155
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (3)
Line range hint
29-44: LGTM! Improved command naming and documentation.The rename from
/deployto/deploy-review-appmakes the command's purpose clearer. Documentation is comprehensive and well-structured.
99-99: LGTM! Documentation consistently uses new command name.The cleanup section correctly references the renamed
/delete-review-appcommand.
106-110: LGTM! Enhanced help resources and support options.Good improvements to the help section:
- Added Control Plane Flow documentation link
- Included ShakaCode support contact
- Clear formatting of help options
| @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ jobs: | |||
| ' - Example: `/deploy timeout=1800`' | |||
| ] | |||
| }, | |||
| destroy: { | |||
| title: '## `/destroy`', | |||
| "delete-review-app: { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix YAML syntax error in command definition.
There's a missing closing quote in the command key name.
- "delete-review-app: {
+ "delete-review-app": {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "delete-review-app: { | |
| "delete-review-app": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.controlplane/controlplane.yml (1)
48-49: LGTM! Good security practice using a dedicated production organization.The explicit "-production" suffix in the organization name and the clear comment about production-only usage enhance security by:
- Clearly distinguishing production resources
- Reducing the risk of accidentally targeting production
- Following the principle of separation of concerns
This change, combined with the existing security controls (
allow_org_override_by_env: false), provides robust protection for production deployments.Consider documenting these security controls in your team's deployment runbook to ensure all team members understand the significance of the separate production organization.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.controlplane/controlplane.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.controlplane/controlplane.yml (1)
48-49: Verify alignment with GitHub Actions workflows.Since this change is part of a larger update involving GitHub Actions workflows, ensure that all workflow files correctly reference the new production organization name.
Run this script to verify the organization references in GitHub Actions workflows:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Organization configuration is correctly implemented
The workflows properly use GitHub Variables (
CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTIONandCPLN_ORG_STAGING) instead of hardcoded values, allowing for flexible organization management across environments. The Control Plane configuration aligns with this approach by setting the production organization value.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to the Control Plane organization in GitHub Actions workflows # and verify they align with the new production organization name echo "Checking organization references in GitHub Actions workflows..." rg -l "CPLN_ORG|shakacode-open-source-examples" .github/workflows/ echo -e "\nChecking specific organization value usage..." rg "shakacode-open-source-examples" .github/workflows/ -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 670
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for CPLN_ORG environment variable usage and organization references in workflows echo "Checking CPLN_ORG usage in workflows..." rg "CPLN_ORG" .github/workflows/ -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\nChecking production organization references..." rg "shakacode-open-source-examples-production" .github/workflows/ -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\nChecking staging organization references..." rg "shakacode-open-source-examples-staging" .github/workflows/ -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 12262
justin808
force-pushed
the
justin808-2
branch
from
84359ef to
269c684
Compare
|
/help |
Available Commands
|
|
/deploy-review-app |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (1)
42-42: Fix command line formatting.The command line contains multiple consecutive spaces before
--verbose. This might cause readability issues in logs.- if ! cpflow promote-app-from-upstream -a "${APP_NAME}" -t "${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" --org "${CPLN_ORG}" --verbose --trace ; then + if ! cpflow promote-app-from-upstream -a "${APP_NAME}" -t "${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" --org "${CPLN_ORG}" --verbose --trace; then
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.controlplane/controlplane.yml(1 hunks).github/actions/validate-required-vars/action.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/actions/validate-required-vars/action.yml
[error] 20-20: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 46-46: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Deploy PR Review App - PR
.github/actions/validate-required-vars/action.yml
[error] 9-9: Unrecognized named-value: 'secrets'. Located at position 1 within expression: secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/actions/validate-required-vars/action.yml (3)
22-40: LGTM! Comprehensive validation of required variables.The implementation properly validates all necessary variables with clear separation between staging and production environments.
43-45: LGTM! Improved error message formatting.The change to use formatted list output makes missing variables easier to identify.
13-19: Verify GitHub Actions runner version compatibility.The pipeline failure suggests a syntax issue with
secretscontext, but the syntax is correct for current GitHub Actions. This might indicate an outdated runner version.Please check your GitHub Actions runner version and ensure it supports the current secrets context syntax. Consider adding this step before the validation:
- name: Check GitHub Actions Runner Version shell: bash run: | echo "GitHub Actions Runner Version: ${{ runner.os }}-${{ runner.arch }} (${{ runner.name }})".github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (3)
12-16: LGTM! Well-structured debug configuration.Good addition of debug capability with safe defaults (disabled).
22-26: LGTM! Improved security and environment configuration.Good separation of concerns:
- Non-sensitive data moved to
vars- Clear distinction between staging and production tokens
- Proper use of secrets for sensitive data
33-36: LGTM! Improved parameter passing.Good change to use explicit
withsyntax for parameter passing, maintaining consistency with production context.
justin808
force-pushed
the
justin808-2
branch
from
ec947bf to
b1d0b14
Compare
|
🚀 Deploying to Control Plane... ⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready... |
|
🚀 Deploying to Control Plane... ⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready... |
justin808
force-pushed
the
justin808-2
branch
from
938e5ca to
2305861
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml (2)
176-179: Improve error handling in event validationThe validation step should set
DO_DEPLOY=falseinstead of exiting with an error when encountering unsupported event types. This would align better with the workflow's error handling pattern and prevent job failures.# Validate supported event types if ! [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "workflow_dispatch" || \ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" || \ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "pull_request" ]]; then - echo "Error: Unsupported event type ${{ github.event_name }}" - exit 1 + echo "Warning: Unsupported event type ${{ github.event_name }}" + echo "DO_DEPLOY=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV + exit 0 fi
408-410: Simplify deployment log linksThe success and failure messages include redundant log links that point to similar information. This could confuse users about which link to follow.
Simplify by keeping only the most specific log link:
// In success message - '📝 [View Build and Deploy Logs](' + workflowUrl + ')', - '', `📋 [View Completed Build and Deploy Logs](${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/actions/runs/${context.runId}/jobs/${context.job.id})` // In failure message - '📝 [View Build and Deploy Logs](' + workflowUrl + ')', - '', `📋 [View Build and Deploy Logs with Errors](${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/actions/runs/${context.runId}/jobs/${context.job.id})`Also applies to: 418-420
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml(7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml
[error] 342-342: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 412-412: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 422-422: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml (2)
202-212: Verify console link availability in initial commentThe initial comment template uses
process.env.CONSOLE_LINKwhich might be undefined at this stage if the app hasn't been created yet. This could result in "undefined" appearing in the comment.Add a conditional check:
body: [ `🏗️ Building Docker image for PR [#${process.env.PR_NUMBER}](${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/pull/${process.env.PR_NUMBER}), commit [${context.sha.substring(0, 7)}](${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/commit/${context.sha})`, '', '🚀 Deploying to Control Plane...', '', '⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready...', '', `📝 [View Build and Deploy Logs](${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/actions/runs/${context.runId}/job/${context.job})`, '', - process.env.CONSOLE_LINK + process.env.CONSOLE_LINK ? process.env.CONSOLE_LINK : '' ].join('\n')
326-334:⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent deployment ID reference
The deployment status update uses
needs.process-deployment.outputs.deployment_id, but the final status update usessteps.init-deployment.outputs.result. This inconsistency could cause the final status update to fail.Standardize the deployment ID reference:
await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, - deployment_id: ${{ needs.process-deployment.outputs.deployment_id }}, + deployment_id: ${{ needs.process-deployment.outputs.deployment_id }}, state: 'in_progress', description: 'Deployment in progress', log_url: process.env.BUILD_LOGS_URL });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| with: | ||
| CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }} | ||
| CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION }} | ||
| CPLN_ORG_STAGING: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }} | ||
| CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION }} | ||
| REVIEW_APP_PREFIX: ${{ vars.REVIEW_APP_PREFIX }} | ||
| PRODUCTION_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.PRODUCTION_APP_NAME }} | ||
| STAGING_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.STAGING_APP_NAME }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Remove unnecessary production credentials validation
The validation step includes production-related variables (CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION, CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION) which are not used in this review app deployment workflow. Including production credentials unnecessarily increases the security attack surface.
Remove the production-related validations:
with:
CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }}
- CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION }}
CPLN_ORG_STAGING: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }}
- CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION }}
REVIEW_APP_PREFIX: ${{ vars.REVIEW_APP_PREFIX }}
- PRODUCTION_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.PRODUCTION_APP_NAME }}
STAGING_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.STAGING_APP_NAME }}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| with: | |
| CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }} | |
| CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION }} | |
| CPLN_ORG_STAGING: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }} | |
| CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION }} | |
| REVIEW_APP_PREFIX: ${{ vars.REVIEW_APP_PREFIX }} | |
| PRODUCTION_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.PRODUCTION_APP_NAME }} | |
| STAGING_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.STAGING_APP_NAME }} | |
| with: | |
| CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }} | |
| CPLN_ORG_STAGING: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }} | |
| REVIEW_APP_PREFIX: ${{ vars.REVIEW_APP_PREFIX }} | |
| STAGING_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.STAGING_APP_NAME }} |
justin808
force-pushed
the
justin808-2
branch
from
2305861 to
6131ce6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml (1)
69-76:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity: Remove unnecessary production credentials validation
The validation step includes production-related variables (
CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION,CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION,PRODUCTION_APP_NAME) which are not used in this review app deployment workflow. Including production credentials unnecessarily increases the security attack surface.Apply this diff to remove the production-related validations:
with: CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }} - CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_PRODUCTION }} CPLN_ORG_STAGING: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }} - CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION: ${{ vars.CPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION }} REVIEW_APP_PREFIX: ${{ vars.REVIEW_APP_PREFIX }} - PRODUCTION_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.PRODUCTION_APP_NAME }} STAGING_APP_NAME: ${{ vars.STAGING_APP_NAME }}
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml (1)
326-362: Enhance deployment status updates with error handlingThe deployment status update lacks error handling for the GitHub API calls. Consider wrapping the API calls in try-catch blocks to handle potential failures gracefully.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
+ try { // Create deployment status for deploying state await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, deployment_id: ${{ needs.process-deployment.outputs.deployment_id }}, state: 'in_progress', description: 'Deployment in progress', log_url: process.env.BUILD_LOGS_URL }); // Get the current job URL and ID const { data: jobs } = await github.rest.actions.listJobsForWorkflowRun({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, run_id: context.runId }); const currentJob = jobs.jobs.find(job => job.name === context.job); const currentJobUrl = `${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${context.repo.owner}/${context.repo.repo}/actions/runs/${context.runId}/job/${currentJob.id}`; // Update the PR comment with correct job URLs await github.rest.issues.updateComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, comment_id: ${{ needs.build.outputs.comment_id }}, body: [ // ... comment body ... ].join('\n') }); + } catch (error) { + core.warning(`Failed to update deployment status: ${error.message}`); + }🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 342-342: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.controlplane/templates/app.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml(8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.controlplane/templates/app.yml
[error] 31-31: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 32-32: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml
[error] 342-342: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 394-394: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 397-397: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 420-420: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 428-428: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review-app.yml (3)
137-139: LGTM! Robust PR number validation and app name setup.The code correctly validates the PR number and sets up the app name with proper environment variables.
176-179: LGTM! Event type validation is comprehensive.The validation correctly checks for supported event types (workflow_dispatch, issue_comment, pull_request).
388-397: LGTM! Deployment status updates with proper log URLs.The code correctly retrieves and uses job-specific log URLs for deployment status updates and comment updates.
Also applies to: 405-405, 418-418, 426-426, 433-433
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 394-394: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 397-397: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
|
|
||
| I stay at 3% and … believe it or not - I recommend that the Buyer’s Agent also gets 3%! | ||
|
|
||
| Here’s WHY: | ||
|
|
||
| -Buyers are still ’SCARCE’… and ANY Buyer's Agent, that actually has one of these rare things called Beachfront Buyers, is looking to earn a full 3% of the Sales Price. | ||
|
|
||
| NOTE: They are all going to put 3% in their Buyer Agency Agreements… just ‘in case’ that 3% 'hoped for' commission is offered. | ||
|
|
||
| Therefore - if you lower that commission - the Buyer has to come up with the difference “In Cash” … and, that’s not good for the Buyer who wants to finance 80%, or more, of that commission he’s agreed to pay his Agent. | ||
|
|
||
| SO | ||
|
|
||
| Why not OFFER that 3% and stick to this Asking Price (or near it)!? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove misplaced business logic from infrastructure configuration.
The added text about commission rates and buyer's agent recommendations does not belong in an infrastructure configuration file. This type of business logic and documentation should be moved to a more appropriate location, such as:
- Business documentation in the project's wiki or docs folder
- Product requirements document
- Sales/Marketing documentation
Additionally, the added text is causing YAML syntax errors. If you need to add comments to this file, use the YAML comment syntax with #:
-
- I stay at 3% and … believe it or not - I recommend that the Buyer's Agent also gets 3%!
-
- Here's WHY:
-
- -Buyers are still 'SCARCE'… and ANY Buyer's Agent, that actually has one of these rare things called Beachfront Buyers, is looking to earn a full 3% of the Sales Price.
-
- NOTE: They are all going to put 3% in their Buyer Agency Agreements… just 'in case' that 3% 'hoped for' commission is offered.
-
- Therefore - if you lower that commission - the Buyer has to come up with the difference "In Cash" … and, that's not good for the Buyer who wants to finance 80%, or more, of that commission he's agreed to pay his Agent.
-
- SO
-
- Why not OFFER that 3% and stick to this Asking Price (or near it)!?Would you like me to help create a new documentation file in a more appropriate location for this business logic?
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 31-31: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 32-32: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (2)
40-43: Improve command readability using line continuation.While the added flags and informative echo message are good improvements, the command readability could be enhanced.
Consider using explicit line continuation for better readability:
- echo "🚀 Starting promotion from staging to production for app ${APP_NAME}" - - echo "upstream_token is ${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" - if ! cpflow promote-app-from-upstream -a "${APP_NAME}" -t "${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" --org "${CPLN_ORG}" --verbose --trace ; then + echo "🚀 Starting promotion from staging to production for app ${APP_NAME}" + echo "upstream_token is ${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" + if ! cpflow promote-app-from-upstream \ + -a "${APP_NAME}" \ + -t "${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" \ + --org "${CPLN_ORG}" \ + --verbose \ + --trace; then🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
41-41: Remove trailing spaces.Static analysis detected trailing spaces. While this is a minor issue, it's good practice to maintain clean code.
Remove trailing spaces from lines 41 and 47.
Also applies to: 47-47
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 47-47: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (3)
12-16: LGTM! Well-structured debug job configuration.The debug job is properly configured using an external workflow, promoting reusability. The explicit
debug_enabledparameter provides good control over debug functionality.
22-25: LGTM! Improved environment variables configuration.Good improvements in the environment variables setup:
- Using
varsfor non-sensitive values likePRODUCTION_APP_NAMEandCPLN_ORG_PRODUCTION- Using
secretsfor sensitive values like tokens- Consistent use of production-specific values
33-35: LGTM! Improved action configuration using 'with' syntax.Good change to use the more idiomatic 'with' syntax for action inputs, maintaining consistency with production-specific values.
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit