Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make useAsyncIterState's iterable's current value property read-only #43

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

shtaif
Copy link
Owner

@shtaif shtaif commented Jan 8, 2025

No description provided.

@shtaif shtaif self-assigned this Jan 8, 2025
@shtaif shtaif changed the title make useAsyncIterState's iterable's current value property read-only Make useAsyncIterState's iterable's current value property read-only Jan 8, 2025
@shtaif shtaif marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 15:52
@shtaif shtaif force-pushed the use-async-iter-state-iter-curr-value-read-only branch from 7123c2f to 0616544 Compare January 8, 2025 15:52
@shtaif shtaif force-pushed the use-async-iter-state-iter-curr-value-read-only branch from 0616544 to a750d57 Compare January 8, 2025 15:55
@shtaif shtaif merged commit 6dd5ac5 into master Jan 8, 2025
6 checks passed
@shtaif shtaif deleted the use-async-iter-state-iter-curr-value-read-only branch January 8, 2025 15:57
shtaif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
## [0.5.1](v0.5.0...v0.5.1) (2025-01-08)

### Bug Fixes

* **useAsyncIterState:** disallow user manipulation of the state iterable's current value property ([#43](#43)) ([6dd5ac5](6dd5ac5))
* **useAsyncIterState:** rapidly updating state yields the first update instead of the last update's value ([#44](#44)) ([b11b5a5](b11b5a5))

### Documentation

* **useAsyncIterState:** missing documentations for the state iterable's added current value property ([#42](#42)) ([675331f](675331f))
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.5.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant