Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(useAsyncIter): allow initial value to be a function, called once on mount #48

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

shtaif
Copy link
Owner

@shtaif shtaif commented Jan 9, 2025

This change is basically a breaking change, however isn't communicated as such because library is still considered on a "beta" status at the moment (in a 0.x.x version range).

@shtaif shtaif self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@shtaif shtaif merged commit 9a7e9e4 into master Jan 9, 2025
6 checks passed
@shtaif shtaif deleted the use-async-iter-init-val-fn branch January 9, 2025 14:24
shtaif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
## [0.7.0](v0.6.0...v0.7.0) (2025-01-22)

### Features

* `iterateFormatted`'s to also format given iterables' current values if present ([#56](#56)) ([9f6e47a](9f6e47a))
* export a `AsyncIterableSubject` type and add it along related references ([#54](#54)) ([39eae6f](39eae6f))
* **Iterate:** support initial value in function form ([#49](#49)) ([bfc1f09](bfc1f09))
* special handling for async iterables with a current value( [#55](#55)) ([01a30fc](01a30fc))
* **useAsyncIter:** allow initial value to be a function, called once on mount ([#48](#48)) ([9a7e9e4](9a7e9e4))

### Bug Fixes

* **iterateFormatted:** function's type signature does not not handle maybe-async-iterable kind of types correctly ([#57](#57)) ([f073d90](f073d90))

### Documentation

* docs edits ([#53](#53)) ([c5bfba4](c5bfba4))
* **readme:** Initial proper `README.md` ([#60](#60)) ([4e1c4a9](4e1c4a9))
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.7.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant