Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fill iterateFormatted's handling of async iters with current values #56

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

shtaif
Copy link
Owner

@shtaif shtaif commented Jan 13, 2025

No description provided.

@shtaif shtaif self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
@shtaif shtaif marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 14:54
@shtaif shtaif merged commit 9f6e47a into master Jan 13, 2025
6 checks passed
@shtaif shtaif deleted the iterate-formatted-curr-value-handling branch January 13, 2025 14:59
shtaif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
## [0.7.0](v0.6.0...v0.7.0) (2025-01-22)

### Features

* `iterateFormatted`'s to also format given iterables' current values if present ([#56](#56)) ([9f6e47a](9f6e47a))
* export a `AsyncIterableSubject` type and add it along related references ([#54](#54)) ([39eae6f](39eae6f))
* **Iterate:** support initial value in function form ([#49](#49)) ([bfc1f09](bfc1f09))
* special handling for async iterables with a current value( [#55](#55)) ([01a30fc](01a30fc))
* **useAsyncIter:** allow initial value to be a function, called once on mount ([#48](#48)) ([9a7e9e4](9a7e9e4))

### Bug Fixes

* **iterateFormatted:** function's type signature does not not handle maybe-async-iterable kind of types correctly ([#57](#57)) ([f073d90](f073d90))

### Documentation

* docs edits ([#53](#53)) ([c5bfba4](c5bfba4))
* **readme:** Initial proper `README.md` ([#60](#60)) ([4e1c4a9](4e1c4a9))
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.7.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant