Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove StringUtils.isEmpty(s) and improve comments #1116

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

caicancai
Copy link
Contributor

@caicancai caicancai commented Jun 25, 2024

Motivation:

StringUtils.isBlank(s) can detect null, empty, and space strings, without retaining StringUtils.isEmpty(s)

Result:

Fixes #.

If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated comments for State enum to clarify the roles of nodes in different states.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified string validation in PeerId class by removing redundant StringUtils.isEmpty check.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on improving code readability and functionality within the JRaft project. Notable changes include enhanced descriptive comments for each state in the State enum and refining the parse method in the PeerId class by removing an unnecessary check, streamlining string validation.

Changes

File Change Summary
jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/core/State.java Added detailed comments for each state in the State enum to enhance readability. Introduced a new state STATE_END with an appropriate comment.
jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/entity/PeerId.java Updated the parse method to remove the StringUtils.isEmpty check, now solely uses StringUtils.isBlank for string validation.

Poem

A rabbit with code so fine,
Enhanced the states with a clearer sign,
PeerId now checks with ease,
Blank fields but not empties please,
In JRaft’s heart, these changes entwine.
🐇✨🍃


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@caicancai caicancai changed the title Comment Remove StringUtils.isEmpty(s) and improve comments Jun 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aefb594 and 4eaf928.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/core/State.java (1 hunks)
  • jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/entity/PeerId.java (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/core/State.java
Additional comments not posted (1)
jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/entity/PeerId.java (1)

195-195: Simplified string validation in parse method.

The change from using both StringUtils.isEmpty(s) and StringUtils.isBlank(s) to only StringUtils.isBlank(s) is a sensible simplification. This change improves the readability and efficiency of the code since StringUtils.isBlank(s) alone covers all cases that the combined checks did.

@caicancai
Copy link
Contributor Author

I should have found this issue in #1113, I'm sorry for that

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eaf928 and e630054.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/core/State.java (1 hunks)
  • jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/entity/PeerId.java (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/core/State.java
  • jraft-core/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/entity/PeerId.java

@killme2008
Copy link
Contributor

I don't encourage barely code refactoring since it can bring extra overhead to cherry-pick.

Code can be written in multiple styles. As long as we don't have a (checkstyle) rule to assert the usage, it brings little value to do such changes.

@caicancai I suggest you spend more time investigating the reported bugs or potential enhancement. Applying your code style preference alongside those efforts.

@killme2008 killme2008 closed this Jun 25, 2024
@caicancai caicancai deleted the comment branch June 26, 2024 01:09
@caicancai
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't encourage barely code refactoring since it can bring extra overhead to cherry-pick.

Code can be written in multiple styles. As long as we don't have a (checkstyle) rule to assert the usage, it brings little value to do such changes.

@caicancai I suggest you spend more time investigating the reported bugs or potential enhancement. Applying your code style preference alongside those efforts.

Thank you for your advice. I will continue to study this project and spend more time on interesting features later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants