Implement CallProfiler

[tigercosmos]

This work is based on the previous #245

This work introduces a new profiler, called CallProfiler, which can print the profiling result of a hierarchical caller stack.

The example output looks like this (please refer to test_nopython_callprofiler.cpp):

constexpr int uniqueTime1 = 19;
constexpr int uniqueTime2 = 35;
constexpr int uniqueTime3 = 7;

void foo3()
{
    modmesh::USE_CALLPROFILER_PROFILE_THIS_FUNCTION();
    std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(uniqueTime1));
}

void foo2()
{
    modmesh::USE_CALLPROFILER_PROFILE_THIS_FUNCTION();
    std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(uniqueTime2));
    foo3();
}

void foo1()
{
    modmesh::USE_CALLPROFILER_PROFILE_THIS_FUNCTION();
    foo2();
    std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(uniqueTime3));
}


int main()
{
    auto & profiler = modmesh::Profiler::instance();

    foo1();
    foo2();
    foo3();
    foo3();
  
    profiler.print_profiling_result();
}

Profiling Result
  foo1 - Total Time: 61 ms, Call Count: 1
    foo2 - Total Time: 54 ms, Call Count: 1
      foo3 - Total Time: 19 ms, Call Count: 1
  foo2 - Total Time: 54 ms, Call Count: 1
    foo3 - Total Time: 19 ms, Call Count: 1
  foo3 - Total Time: 38 ms, Call Count: 2

cc @q40603

[tigercosmos]

we use the macro here to insert the profiler.

[tigercosmos]

The implementation is almost there. I will fix the CI once the proposal is accepted.

[tigercosmos]

just for demonstration here, I think it's better to compare each node one by one.

[yungyuc]

The implementation is almost there. I will fix the CI once the proposal is accepted.

Let me add comments after the feedback from @q40603 .

But I would like the code review to happen after CI is clean. Fixing CI needs to change code, which requires additional review. It does not make sense to ask for review before making CI clean.

modmesh CI includes linter. It wastes precious reviewing resources when the linter automatically tells you there are things needing to be fixed.

[tigercosmos]

I would like to have more discussion on this PR, let me close this one can create a new draft PR.