Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add preBatchAction to Admin Extension and add a pre_batch_action event #7579
Add preBatchAction to Admin Extension and add a pre_batch_action event #7579
Changes from all commits
39ba323
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The array of IDs selected for the batch actions is passed by reference everywhere. Also to the
AbstractAdmin::preBatchAction()
for example. This enables you to manipulate the IDs. So here it should also be returned by reference, hence the&
in front of the function name.This enables you to manipulate the array of IDs in your event listener/subscriber:
Above will result in the batch action also being executed on object with ID 123. Of course this is an example and normally you'll have some business logic in there. And you could also remove IDs of course.
This can already be done in an Admin's
preBatchAction()
method.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't know this syntax. Thanks for the explanation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't be better to have getters and setters?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Like:
That could be possible. However, I tried to be consistent with the concept of passing by reference that is already in the existing code for
preBatchAction()
In my opinion I think it would be better to have an array object so the whole passing by reference is not necessary, but that would be breaking compatibility for the existing code of
preBatchAction()
. Maybe this is a good idea for 5.x