ci: disable unnecessary linter settings #411
Conversation
WalkthroughThe GitHub Actions linter workflow configuration has been updated to include four new environment variables that disable validation for specific file types: JavaScript ES, TypeScript ES, JSON, and JSON Prettier. These additions provide more granular control over the linting process by explicitly excluding certain validations. The workflow's core structure, including triggers, job configuration, and action usage, remains consistent with the previous implementation. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/linter.yml (1)
Update super-linter to v7.2.1
A newer version (v7.2.1) of super-linter is available. Update the version in the workflow file to ensure you're using the latest stable release with bug fixes and improvements.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
28-28: Verify super-linter versionThe workflow uses super-linter v7.2.0. Let's verify if this is the latest stable version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check latest super-linter version gh api repos/super-linter/super-linter/releases/latest --jq .tag_nameLength of output: 78
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/linter.yml (1)
39-42: Document the rationale for disabling these lintersConsider adding a comment in the workflow file explaining why these specific linters are being disabled. This will help future maintainers understand the decision-making process.
Add a comment above the disabled validations:
VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_STANDARD: 'false' VALIDATE_TYPESCRIPT_STANDARD: 'false' VALIDATE_CHECKOV: 'false' + # Disabled due to [reason] - alternative linting provided by [tool] VALIDATE_JAVASCRIPT_ES: 'false' VALIDATE_TYPESCRIPT_ES: 'false' VALIDATE_JSON: 'false' VALIDATE_JSON_PRETTIER: 'false'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/linter.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/linter.yml (1)
39-42: Verify alternative linting mechanisms are in place
Disabling these linters could potentially impact code quality:
- Both ES and Standard linters are disabled for JavaScript/TypeScript
- JSON validation is completely disabled
Please ensure that:
- Alternative linting tools or IDE configurations are in place
- These changes don't bypass important code quality checks
Let's verify if alternative linting configurations exist:
✅ Verification successful
Alternative linting is properly configured - safe to disable super-linter validations
The repository has a comprehensive ESLint setup that covers the disabled validations:
- TypeScript/JavaScript linting via
@typescript-eslintwith recommended configs - YAML linting via
eslint-plugin-ymlwith recommended configs - Strict TypeScript configuration (requires
tsconfig.json) - Essential rules like unused variables, semicolons, etc.
The super-linter's disabled validations are redundant since ESLint is already handling these validations with proper configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for alternative linting configurations
echo "Checking for ESLint configuration..."
fd -e json -e js -e yml -e yaml -e cjs -e mjs -H "eslint"
echo "Checking for TypeScript configuration..."
fd -e json "tsconfig"
echo "Checking for Prettier configuration..."
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -e js -H "prettier"
echo "Checking for other linting tools in package.json..."
fd "package.json" --exec cat {} | jq '.devDependencies | keys[] | select(contains("lint"))'
Length of output: 717
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of ESLint configuration
echo "ESLint configuration content:"
cat eslint.config.mjs
echo -e "\nPackage.json scripts section:"
fd "package.json" --exec cat {} | jq '.scripts | with_entries(select(.key | contains("lint")))'
Length of output: 1822
Pull Request
Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit