Add oauni scientometrics paper

about.Rmd

@@ -34,10 +34,12 @@ Jahn, N. (2024). How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreeme
 
 Culbert, J., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., Mayr, P. (2024). Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. <https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16359>
 
+Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., & Iravani, E. (2024). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German University landscape (2010–2020): Part 2—repository-provided OA. Scientometrics. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05003-5>
+
 Fraser, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Mayr, P., & Peters, I. (2023). No deal: German researchers’ publishing and citing behaviors after Big Deal negotiations with Elsevier.
 *Quantitative Science Studies*, 4(2), 325--352. <https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00255>
 
-Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., & Iravani, E. (2023). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German university landscape (2010–2020): part 1—journal-based OA. *Scientometrics*, 128(6), 3601–3625. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3>
+Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., & Iravani, E. (2023). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German university landscape (2010–2020): Part 1—journal-based OA. *Scientometrics*, 128(6), 3601–3625. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3>
 
 Haupka, N., Jahn, N., & Hobert, N. (2022). Praxisbericht Big Scholarly Data an der SUB Göttingen. *LIBREAS. Library Ideas*, 41 (2022). <https://libreas.eu/ausgabe41/haupka/>
 

docs/about.html

@@ -2210,9 +2210,10 @@ <h2 id="journal-publications">Journal publications</h2>
 <p>We also publish in scholarly journals about our work.</p>
 <p>Jahn, N. (2024). How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18255" class="uri">https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18255</a></p>
 <p>Culbert, J., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., Mayr, P. (2024). Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16359" class="uri">https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16359</a></p>
+<p>Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., &amp; Iravani, E. (2024). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German University landscape (2010–2020): Part 2—repository-provided OA. Scientometrics. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05003-5" class="uri">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05003-5</a></p>
 <p>Fraser, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Mayr, P., &amp; Peters, I. (2023). No deal: German researchers’ publishing and citing behaviors after Big Deal negotiations with Elsevier.
 <em>Quantitative Science Studies</em>, 4(2), 325–352. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00255" class="uri">https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00255</a></p>
-<p>Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., &amp; Iravani, E. (2023). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German university landscape (2010–2020): part 1—journal-based OA. <em>Scientometrics</em>, 128(6), 3601–3625. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3" class="uri">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3</a></p>
+<p>Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., &amp; Iravani, E. (2023). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German university landscape (2010–2020): Part 1—journal-based OA. <em>Scientometrics</em>, 128(6), 3601–3625. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3" class="uri">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3</a></p>
 <p>Haupka, N., Jahn, N., &amp; Hobert, N. (2022). Praxisbericht Big Scholarly Data an der SUB Göttingen. <em>LIBREAS. Library Ideas</em>, 41 (2022). <a href="https://libreas.eu/ausgabe41/haupka/" class="uri">https://libreas.eu/ausgabe41/haupka/</a></p>
 <p>Jahn, N., Matthias, L., &amp; Laakso, M. (2022). Toward transparency of
 hybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level

docs/index.html

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 <style type="text/css">code{white-space: pre;}</style>
 <style type="text/css" data-origin="pandoc">
 pre > code.sourceCode { white-space: pre; position: relative; }
-pre > code.sourceCode > span { line-height: 1.25; }
+pre > code.sourceCode > span { display: inline-block; line-height: 1.25; }
 pre > code.sourceCode > span:empty { height: 1.2em; }
 .sourceCode { overflow: visible; }
 code.sourceCode > span { color: inherit; text-decoration: inherit; }
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 }
 @media print {
 pre > code.sourceCode { white-space: pre-wrap; }
-pre > code.sourceCode > span { display: inline-block; text-indent: -5em; padding-left: 5em; }
+pre > code.sourceCode > span { text-indent: -5em; padding-left: 5em; }
 }
 pre.numberSource code
   { counter-reset: source-line 0; }

docs/search.json

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
       "path": "about.html",
       "title": "About us",
       "author": [],
-      "contents": "\n\nContents\nAbout this Blog!\nJournal publications\nTheses\nSoftware\nThird-party funded projects\n\nAbout this Blog!\nWelcome to our Blog! Here, you’ll find insights from our work as Data Analysts in the domain of scholarly communication. With this blog, we want to engage with the broader community about how to support data-driven workflows and decision-making around scholarly communication with R.\nWe are based at the Göttingen State and University Library, one of the largest academic libraries in Germany. We are using R-based tools in our everyday work and contribute to R package developments and training activities. In this blog, you’ll find news and case-studies around:\nOpen Access and Open Science Analytics\nR Packages making use of open databases and helping us in our work\nR Tools for interactive visualizations and dashboard developments\nR-related training and outreach activities\nWe want to thank Maëlle Salmon for encouraging us to start a blog about our work. As a technical framework for the blog, we are using Distill for R Markdown, a new web publishing format optimized for scientific and technical writing.\nDr. Anne Hobert, Nick Haupka, Najko Jahn\nJournal publications\nWe also publish in scholarly journals about our work.\nJahn, N. (2024). How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18255\nCulbert, J., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., Mayr, P. (2024). Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16359\nFraser, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Mayr, P., & Peters, I. (2023). No deal: German researchers’ publishing and citing behaviors after Big Deal negotiations with Elsevier.\nQuantitative Science Studies, 4(2), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00255\nTaubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., & Iravani, E. (2023). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German university landscape (2010–2020): part 1—journal-based OA. Scientometrics, 128(6), 3601–3625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3\nHaupka, N., Jahn, N., & Hobert, N. (2022). Praxisbericht Big Scholarly Data an der SUB Göttingen. LIBREAS. Library Ideas, 41 (2022). https://libreas.eu/ausgabe41/haupka/\nJahn, N., Matthias, L., & Laakso, M. (2022). Toward transparency of\nhybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level\nstudy of Elsevier. Journal of the Association for Information Science\nand Technology, 73(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24549\nJahn, N., Held, M., Walter, H., Haupka, N., & Hillenkötter, K. (2022).\nHOAD: Data Analytics für mehr Transparenz bei\nOpen-Access-Transformationsverträgen. ABI Technik, 42(1), 64–69.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2022-0007\nStisser, A., Jahn, N., & Schmidt, B. (2022). Stand und Perspektiven bibliometriegestützter Open-Access-Services an Universitäten in Deutschland. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 46(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2021-0098\nHobert, A., Jahn, N., Mayr, P., Schmidt, B., & Taubert, N. (2021). Open\naccess uptake in Germany 2010–2018: adoption in a diverse research\nlandscape. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9751–9777.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04002-0\nLaakso, M., Matthias, L., & Jahn, N. (2021). Open is not forever: A\nstudy of vanished open access journals. Journal of the Association for\nInformation Science and Technology, 72(9), 1099–1112.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24460 (Featured in Nature, Science and CNN)\nJahn, N., Hobert, A., & Haupka, N. (2021). Entwicklung und Typologie des\nDatendiensts Unpaywall. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 45(2),\n293–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2020-0115\nMatthias, L., Jahn, N., & Laakso, M. (2019). The Two-Way Street of Open\nAccess Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It. Publications, 7(2),\n23. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020023\nTheses\nHaupka, N. (2021). Analyse der Entwicklung des Open Access-Discovery-Services Unpaywall seit 2018 [Bachelor Thesis, Hochschule Hannover]. https://doi.org/10.25968/opus-1899\nSoftware\nR-Packages (selection):\nJahn, N. europepmc: R Interface to the Europe PubMed Central RESTful Web Service. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=europepmc | https://docs.ropensci.org/europepmc/\nChamberlain, S., Zhu, H., Jahn, N., Boettiger, C., Ram, K. rcrossref: Client for Various ‘CrossRef’ ‘APIs’. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcrossref https://docs.ropensci.org/rcrossref/\nJahn, N (2022). roadoi: Find Free Versions of Scholarly Publications via Unpaywall. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=roadoi | https://docs.ropensci.org/roadoi/.\nDashboards (selection):\nHybrid Open Access Dashboard (HOAD). See our blog post: https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/introducing-the-hybrid-open-access-dashboard-hoad/\nmetacheck: Open Access Metadata Compliance Checker\nOpen Access uptake in Germany 2010-2018: Interactive Supplement\nThird-party funded projects\nBMBF\nKompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie: Komparative Analyse und Kuratierung Deutscher Metadaten in Offenen Bibliometriedaten, Teilprojekt: Bereitstellung und Analyse Dokumenttypen\nKompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie, Teilprojekt: Datenergänzung: Open-Access-Nachweise\nindi:oa - Verantwortungsbewusste Bewertung und Qualitätssicherung von Open-Access Publikationen mittels bibliometrischer Indikatoren (concluded)\nOAUNI - Entwicklung und Einflussfaktoren des Open-Access-Publizierens an Universitäten in Deutschland (concluded)\nDFG\nOA-Datenpraxis: Datenpraxis zur Gestaltung der Open-Access-Transformation - Analyse, Empfehlung, Training & Vernetzung\nHybrid OA Dashboards: Mehrwertorientierte Analytics-Anwendungen zur Förderung der Kostentransparenz bei Transformationsverträgen (concluded)\nEuropean Commission\nOn-Merrit (concluded)\nOpenAIRE Nexus (concluded)\n\n\n\n",
-      "last_modified": "2024-04-17T11:15:53+02:00"
+      "contents": "\n\nContents\nAbout this Blog!\nJournal publications\nTheses\nSoftware\nThird-party funded projects\n\nAbout this Blog!\nWelcome to our Blog! Here, you’ll find insights from our work as Data Analysts in the domain of scholarly communication. With this blog, we want to engage with the broader community about how to support data-driven workflows and decision-making around scholarly communication with R.\nWe are based at the Göttingen State and University Library, one of the largest academic libraries in Germany. We are using R-based tools in our everyday work and contribute to R package developments and training activities. In this blog, you’ll find news and case-studies around:\nOpen Access and Open Science Analytics\nR Packages making use of open databases and helping us in our work\nR Tools for interactive visualizations and dashboard developments\nR-related training and outreach activities\nWe want to thank Maëlle Salmon for encouraging us to start a blog about our work. As a technical framework for the blog, we are using Distill for R Markdown, a new web publishing format optimized for scientific and technical writing.\nDr. Anne Hobert, Nick Haupka, Najko Jahn\nJournal publications\nWe also publish in scholarly journals about our work.\nJahn, N. (2024). How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18255\nCulbert, J., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., Mayr, P. (2024). Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16359\nTaubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., & Iravani, E. (2024). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German University landscape (2010–2020): Part 2—repository-provided OA. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05003-5\nFraser, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Mayr, P., & Peters, I. (2023). No deal: German researchers’ publishing and citing behaviors after Big Deal negotiations with Elsevier.\nQuantitative Science Studies, 4(2), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00255\nTaubert, N., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Bruns, A., & Iravani, E. (2023). Understanding differences of the OA uptake within the German university landscape (2010–2020): Part 1—journal-based OA. Scientometrics, 128(6), 3601–3625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04716-3\nHaupka, N., Jahn, N., & Hobert, N. (2022). Praxisbericht Big Scholarly Data an der SUB Göttingen. LIBREAS. Library Ideas, 41 (2022). https://libreas.eu/ausgabe41/haupka/\nJahn, N., Matthias, L., & Laakso, M. (2022). Toward transparency of\nhybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level\nstudy of Elsevier. Journal of the Association for Information Science\nand Technology, 73(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24549\nJahn, N., Held, M., Walter, H., Haupka, N., & Hillenkötter, K. (2022).\nHOAD: Data Analytics für mehr Transparenz bei\nOpen-Access-Transformationsverträgen. ABI Technik, 42(1), 64–69.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2022-0007\nStisser, A., Jahn, N., & Schmidt, B. (2022). Stand und Perspektiven bibliometriegestützter Open-Access-Services an Universitäten in Deutschland. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 46(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2021-0098\nHobert, A., Jahn, N., Mayr, P., Schmidt, B., & Taubert, N. (2021). Open\naccess uptake in Germany 2010–2018: adoption in a diverse research\nlandscape. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9751–9777.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04002-0\nLaakso, M., Matthias, L., & Jahn, N. (2021). Open is not forever: A\nstudy of vanished open access journals. Journal of the Association for\nInformation Science and Technology, 72(9), 1099–1112.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24460 (Featured in Nature, Science and CNN)\nJahn, N., Hobert, A., & Haupka, N. (2021). Entwicklung und Typologie des\nDatendiensts Unpaywall. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 45(2),\n293–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2020-0115\nMatthias, L., Jahn, N., & Laakso, M. (2019). The Two-Way Street of Open\nAccess Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It. Publications, 7(2),\n23. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020023\nTheses\nHaupka, N. (2021). Analyse der Entwicklung des Open Access-Discovery-Services Unpaywall seit 2018 [Bachelor Thesis, Hochschule Hannover]. https://doi.org/10.25968/opus-1899\nSoftware\nR-Packages (selection):\nJahn, N. europepmc: R Interface to the Europe PubMed Central RESTful Web Service. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=europepmc | https://docs.ropensci.org/europepmc/\nChamberlain, S., Zhu, H., Jahn, N., Boettiger, C., Ram, K. rcrossref: Client for Various ‘CrossRef’ ‘APIs’. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcrossref https://docs.ropensci.org/rcrossref/\nJahn, N (2022). roadoi: Find Free Versions of Scholarly Publications via Unpaywall. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=roadoi | https://docs.ropensci.org/roadoi/.\nDashboards (selection):\nHybrid Open Access Dashboard (HOAD). See our blog post: https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/introducing-the-hybrid-open-access-dashboard-hoad/\nmetacheck: Open Access Metadata Compliance Checker\nOpen Access uptake in Germany 2010-2018: Interactive Supplement\nThird-party funded projects\nBMBF\nKompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie: Komparative Analyse und Kuratierung Deutscher Metadaten in Offenen Bibliometriedaten, Teilprojekt: Bereitstellung und Analyse Dokumenttypen\nKompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie, Teilprojekt: Datenergänzung: Open-Access-Nachweise\nindi:oa - Verantwortungsbewusste Bewertung und Qualitätssicherung von Open-Access Publikationen mittels bibliometrischer Indikatoren (concluded)\nOAUNI - Entwicklung und Einflussfaktoren des Open-Access-Publizierens an Universitäten in Deutschland (concluded)\nDFG\nOA-Datenpraxis: Datenpraxis zur Gestaltung der Open-Access-Transformation - Analyse, Empfehlung, Training & Vernetzung\nHybrid OA Dashboards: Mehrwertorientierte Analytics-Anwendungen zur Förderung der Kostentransparenz bei Transformationsverträgen (concluded)\nEuropean Commission\nOn-Merrit (concluded)\nOpenAIRE Nexus (concluded)\n\n\n\n",
+      "last_modified": "2024-04-26T10:38:30+02:00"
     },
     {
       "path": "data.html",
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
       "title": "Blog | Scholarly Communication Analytics with R",
       "author": [],
       "contents": "\n\n\n\n",
-      "last_modified": "2024-04-17T11:11:44+02:00"
+      "last_modified": "2024-04-26T10:38:06+02:00"
     }
   ],
   "collections": ["posts/posts.json"]

docs/sitemap.xml

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd" version="1.0">
   <url>
     <loc>https://subugoe.github.io/scholcomm_analytics/about.html</loc>
-    <lastmod>2024-04-17T11:15:35+02:00</lastmod>
+    <lastmod>2024-04-26T10:38:25+02:00</lastmod>
   </url>
   <url>
     <loc>https://subugoe.github.io/scholcomm_analytics/data.html</loc>