Minor issues

[ianmilligan1]

Most of the smaller tweaks are pretty straightforward, but I did want to flag two that I had questions on. I figured others may want to tweak so I opened a Pull Request on the branch.

I wasn't entirely sure of these two ones below:

SUGGESTION: It would be useful to provide the URL in the text for rule #3 since online best practices for lesson development circles back to online collaborative lesson development.

In this case, do we think the reviewer is referring to having a link for Software Carpentry? I inserted it. In any case, Rule 3 may be redesigned in line with issue #41.

SUGGESTION: In Rule #5, it would be helpful if the authors redirected to Rule #6 when discussing recognizing contributions.

I like the division that we have in Rules 5 and 6 right now, so wasn't sure about a significant reorganization (I think that'd also unbalance the text). I thought about potentially adding a sentence like

It can also help with the formal and informal recognition of labour, discussed in the following rule.

But I don't think we need signposting when the rules are so close to each other.

[gdevenyi]

Looks good.

I'm with you not needing signposting. One would hope they would read the whole document in one go, in which case its not needed.

[raynamharris]

This looks good to me. And, As far as I can tell doesn't conflict with PR 48, so I'm going to merge

[ianmilligan1]

Thanks for the merge!