packit: try out TFT #11
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mrc0mmand
force-pushed
the
tft
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c3d6d77
to
474dbda
Compare
|
/packit build |
1 similar comment
|
/packit build |
|
Currently blocked by: https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/184 |
mrc0mmand
force-pushed
the
tft
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1f553f0
to
0521cff
Compare
|
/packit build |
3 similar comments
|
/packit build |
|
/packit build |
|
/packit build |
|
/packit build |
1 similar comment
|
/packit build |
|
/packit test |
1 similar comment
|
/packit test |
|
/packit build |
1 similar comment
|
/packit build |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit build |
|
/packit test |
5 similar comments
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
5 similar comments
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
3 similar comments
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
|
/packit test |
1 similar comment
|
/packit test |
As they're not optional.
I'm pretty sure this is not the only case, but it's the one I recently noticed. Even though we call ddebug() from a function, that function is called before ddebug() is defined, resulting in the same issue as if we called just ddebug() in its place, i.e.: ..//test-functions: line 276: ddebug: command not found
Let's utilize the full power of Packit and run some tests with the just built RPMs. This makes use of the Fedora infrastructure provided by the Testing Farm project [0][1]. With the current configuration, the `tests` job runs tests from the Fedora tests repository [2] in a very similar fashion like Ubuntu CI does, just with different metadata all around it. ATTOW there are only two tests, which are wrappers around unit tests and integration tests; the latter one currently runs only nspawn-based tests, since there's no KVM on the test VMs, and, for now, I'd like to see how well the infra is going to manage our upstream traffic. [0] https://docs.testing-farm.io/Testing%20Farm/0.1/index.html [1] https://packit.dev/docs/configuration/upstream/tests [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/tests/systemd
mrc0mmand
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2023
fuzzers randomly fail with the following:
```
==172==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x7f41169cb39b in update_argv /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/argv-util.c:96:13
#1 0x7f41169cb39b in rename_process /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/argv-util.c:210:16
#2 0x7f4116b6824e in safe_fork_full /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/process-util.c:1516:21
#3 0x7f4116bffa36 in safe_fork /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/process-util.h:191:16
#4 0x7f4116bffa36 in parse_timestamp /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/time-util.c:1047:13
#5 0x4a61e6 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/fuzz/fuzz-time-util.c:16:16
#6 0x4c4a13 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:611:15
#7 0x4c41fa in fuzzer::Fuzzer::RunOne(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, bool, fuzzer::InputInfo*, bool, bool*) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:514:3
#8 0x4c58c9 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::MutateAndTestOne() /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:757:19
#9 0x4c6595 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::__Fuzzer::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, std::__Fuzzer::allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:895:5
#10 0x4b58ff in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerDriver.cpp:912:6
#11 0x4def52 in main /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerMain.cpp:20:10
#12 0x7f4115ea3082 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x24082) (BuildId: e678fe54a5d2c2092f8e47eb0b33105e380f7340)
#13 0x41f5ad in _start (build-out/fuzz-time-util+0x41f5ad)
DEDUP_TOKEN: update_argv--rename_process--safe_fork_full
Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'fv' in the stack frame of function 'have_effective_cap'
#0 0x7f41169d3540 in have_effective_cap /work/build/../../src/systemd/src/basic/capability-util.c:21
```
mrc0mmand
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
Since libfuzzer feeds a single fuzzing process with multiple inputs, we
might carry over arg_transport from a previous invocation, tripping over
the assert in acquire_bus():
+----------------------------------------Release Build Stacktrace----------------------------------------+
Assertion 'transport != BUS_TRANSPORT_REMOTE || runtime_scope == RUNTIME_SCOPE_SYSTEM' failed at src/shared/bus-util.c:284, function bus_connect_transport(). Aborting.
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==2739==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: ABRT on unknown address 0x00000ab3 (pc 0xf7f52509 bp 0xffdf74cc sp 0xffdf74b0 T0)
SCARINESS: 10 (signal)
#0 0xf7f52509 in linux-gate.so.1
#1 0xf703b415 in raise
#2 0xf70233f6 in abort
#3 0xf772ac0a in log_assert_failed systemd/src/basic/log.c:968:9
#4 0xf77300d5 in log_assert_failed_return systemd/src/basic/log.c:987:17
#5 0xf7432bbf in bus_connect_transport systemd/src/shared/bus-util.c:284:9
#6 0x818cd17 in acquire_bus systemd/src/systemctl/systemctl-util.c:53:29
#7 0x815fd3c in help_boot_loader_entry systemd/src/systemctl/systemctl-logind.c:431:13
#8 0x819ca87 in systemctl_parse_argv systemd/src/systemctl/systemctl.c:863:37
#9 0x8197632 in systemctl_dispatch_parse_argv systemd/src/systemctl/systemctl.c:1137:16
#10 0x813328d in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput systemd/src/systemctl/fuzz-systemctl-parse-argv.c:54:13
#11 0x81bbe7e in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned int) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:611:15
#12 0x81bb5b8 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::RunOne(unsigned char const*, unsigned int, bool, fuzzer::InputInfo*, bool, bool*) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:514:3
#13 0x81bd42d in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ReadAndExecuteSeedCorpora(std::__Fuzzer::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, std::__Fuzzer::allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:826:7
#14 0x81bd62e in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::__Fuzzer::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, std::__Fuzzer::allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile> >&) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerLoop.cpp:857:3
#15 0x81ac84c in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned int)) /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerDriver.cpp:912:6
#16 0x81d65c7 in main /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerMain.cpp:20:10
#17 0xf7024ed4 in __libc_start_main
#18 0x806bdb5 in _start
Resolves: #30802
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.