Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed TypeError in CyclicalLearningRate #2756

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

verenaAI
Copy link

Description

Fixed bug which appears at the end of the first training epoch. With TF2.5 or higher, the optimizer returns the step variable as int64 but the scale_fn function needs it to be of type float for Triangular2CyclicalLearningRate and ExponentialCyclicalLearningRate.

Type of change

Checklist:

  • I've properly formatted my code according to the guidelines
    • By running Black + Flake8
    • By running pre-commit hooks
  • This PR addresses an already submitted issue for TensorFlow Addons
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • This PR contains modifications to C++ custom-ops

How Has This Been Tested?

Fixed bug which appears at the end of the first epoch. With TF2.5 or higher the optimizer returns the step variable as int64 but the scale_fn function needs it to be float for Triangular2CyclicalLearningRate and ExponentialCyclicalLearningRate.
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 13, 2022

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@bot-of-gabrieldemarmiesse

@RaphaelMeudec

You are owner of some files modified in this pull request.
Would you kindly review the changes whenever you have the time to?
Thank you very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants