-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: add missing fields to $$Props in FloatingLableInput #1461
Conversation
@theleeeo is attempting to deploy a commit to the Themesberg Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/routes/component-data/FloatingLabelInput.json (1)
49-63
: LGTM: New styling properties added, documentation neededThe addition of
classDiv?
,classInput?
, andclassLabel?
properties enhances the component's flexibility for custom styling. These optional string properties with default empty values maintain backward compatibility.However, to improve usability and maintain code quality:
Please add documentation comments for each new property, explaining their purpose and usage. For example:
[ "classDiv?", "string", "''", "Custom CSS class for the outer div element" ], [ "classInput?", "string", "''", "Custom CSS class for the input element" ], [ "classLabel?", "string", "''", "Custom CSS class for the label element" ]src/lib/forms/FloatingLabelInput.svelte (1)
90-93
: LGTM: New class properties correctly applied in the templateThe new
classDiv
,classInput
, andclassLabel
properties are correctly applied to their respective elements using thetwMerge
function. This implementation allows for flexible styling while maintaining the existing class structure.For consistency, consider adding a line break before the closing angle bracket of the
<input>
element, similar to the<div>
and<label>
elements. This would improve readability:- <input {id} {...$$restProps} bind:value on:blur on:change on:click on:focus on:input on:keydown on:keypress on:keyup on:mouseenter on:mouseleave on:mouseover on:paste {...{ type }} placeholder=" " class={twMerge(inputClasses[style], inputColorClasses[color], inputSizes[style][size], classInput)} /> + <input + {id} + {...$$restProps} + bind:value + on:blur + on:change + on:click + on:focus + on:input + on:keydown + on:keypress + on:keyup + on:mouseenter + on:mouseleave + on:mouseover + on:paste + {...{ type }} + placeholder=" " + class={twMerge(inputClasses[style], inputColorClasses[color], inputSizes[style][size], classInput)} + />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/lib/forms/FloatingLabelInput.svelte (4 hunks)
- src/routes/component-data/FloatingLabelInput.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/routes/component-data/FloatingLabelInput.json (3)
4-17
: LGTM: Improved readability of events arrayThe events array has been reformatted from a single line to multiple lines. This change enhances readability without altering the functionality, which is a positive improvement.
19-48
: LGTM: Consistent formatting of props arrayThe existing properties in the props array have been reformatted to a multi-line structure, matching the new format of the events array. This change improves readability and maintains consistency throughout the file without altering any functionality.
1-65
: Summary: Positive changes enhancing component flexibilityThe changes to
FloatingLabelInput.json
successfully address the PR objectives by adding missing fields to $$Props. The new properties (classDiv?
,classInput?
, andclassLabel?
) enhance the component's styling flexibility while maintaining backward compatibility.The file's overall structure and formatting have been improved, contributing to better readability and maintainability. Once the suggested documentation is added, these changes will significantly improve the
FloatingLabelInput
component's usability and customization options.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check if similar changes have been applied to other component configuration files:
src/lib/forms/FloatingLabelInput.svelte (4)
14-16
: LGTM: New properties added to $$Props interfaceThe addition of
classDiv
,classInput
, andclassLabel
properties to the $$Props interface is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. These new properties will allow for more flexible styling of the component.
25-27
: LGTM: New properties exported with correct initializationThe export statements for
classDiv
,classInput
, andclassLabel
are correctly implemented. They are properly typed and initialized with empty strings, which is a suitable default for optional class properties.
108-110
: LGTM: New properties correctly documentedThe @prop annotations for
classDiv
,classInput
, andclassLabel
have been correctly added to the component's documentation. This ensures that the new properties are properly documented for future reference.
Line range hint
1-110
: Summary: PR objectives successfully addressedThis PR successfully adds the missing fields (
classDiv
,classInput
, andclassLabel
) to the $$Props interface in the FloatingLabelInput component. The changes are well-implemented, consistent with the existing code style, and properly documented. These additions will resolve the TypeScript errors mentioned in the PR objectives when using the $$prop syntax.A minor suggestion was made for code formatting to improve readability, but overall, the changes look good and achieve the intended goals.
To ensure that these changes resolve the TypeScript errors mentioned in the PR objectives, you may want to run the following command in your CI/CD pipeline or locally:
This command will perform a TypeScript check without emitting files, which should catch any remaining type-related issues.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
If you find more, please create another PR. Thank you for your contribution. |
📑 Description
The $$Props in multiple components are missing some fields that are used by the component.
If a component uses a prop by the $$prop syntax it will work when rendering but it will produce typescript errors.
This issue exists for multiple components, not just this one.
✅ Checks
Summary by CodeRabbit
FloatingLabelInput
component with new optional properties for custom class names (classDiv
,classInput
,classLabel
), allowing for improved styling flexibility.FloatingLabelInput
component for better readability and included new properties in the documentation.