-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ladd review1 #607
Ladd review1 #607
Conversation
bit better. I also removed some redundant text.
Updated to restructure the text around ClientHelloOuterAAD. |
@@ -1217,6 +1231,13 @@ ClientHellos, as this allows a network attacker to disclose the contents of this | |||
ClientHello, including the SNI. It MAY attempt to use another server from the | |||
DNS results, if one is provided. | |||
|
|||
In order to ensure that the retry mechanism works successfully servers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: "ensure" twice in one sentence
In order to ensure that the retry mechanism works successfully servers | |
In order to guarantee that the retry mechanism works successfully servers |
forbids "encrypted_client_hello" in OuterExtensions. This ensures the | ||
unauthenticated portion of ClientHelloOuter is not incorporated into | ||
ClientHelloInner. | ||
An earlier iteration of this specification only | ||
encrypted and authenticated the "server_name" extension, which left the overall | ||
ClientHello vulnerable to an analogue of this attack. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Orthogonal: Do we want to add a note for the RFC editor to drop this text about "an earlier version of this specification"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I think this is helpful
Co-authored-by: Christopher Patton <[email protected]>
This addresses most of the comments in @wbl's review, except for (1) whether we should recommend grease-psk and (2) restructuring the text around ClientHelloOuterAAD.