-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tpetra: use GIDs to convert from point matrix to block matrix #12914
Tpetra: use GIDs to convert from point matrix to block matrix #12914
Conversation
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - User Requested Retest - Label AT: RETEST will be reset after testing. |
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - Auto Inspected - Inspection is Not Necessary for this Pull Request. |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Failure: Job Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0 on Jenkins server at https://do.sandia.gov/trilinos-ci Does Not Exist
|
AutoTester is currently broken due to some issues with our Jenkins services. I've made and pinned a GitHub issue about this and will update and unpinned it when the issue has resolved. |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - User Requested Retest - Label AT: RETEST will be reset after testing. |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Testing Jenkins Projects: Pull Request Auto Testing STARTING (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-serial
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_clang-11.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_python3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.2-uvm-off
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_intel-2021.3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.20-uvm
Jenkins Parameters
Using Repos:
Pull Request Author: kliegeois |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Jenkins Testing: 1 or more Jobs FAILED Note: Testing will normally be attempted again in approx. 2 Hrs 30 Mins. If a change to the PR source branch occurs, the testing will be attempted again on next available autotester run. Pull Request Auto Testing has FAILED (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-serial
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_clang-11.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_python3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.2-uvm-off
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_intel-2021.3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.20-uvm
Jenkins Parameters
|
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - User Requested Retest - Label AT: RETEST will be reset after testing. |
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - Auto Inspected - Inspection is Not Necessary for this Pull Request. |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Testing Jenkins Projects: Pull Request Auto Testing STARTING (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-serial
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_clang-11.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_python3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.2-uvm-off
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_intel-2021.3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.20-uvm
Jenkins Parameters
Using Repos:
Pull Request Author: kliegeois |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Jenkins Testing: all Jobs PASSED Pull Request Auto Testing has PASSED (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-serial
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_gcc-8.3.0-debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_clang-11.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_python3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.2-uvm-off
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_intel-2021.3
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_PR_cuda-11.4.20-uvm
Jenkins Parameters
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - - This Pull Request Requires Inspection... The code must be inspected by a member of the Team before Testing/Merging |
All Jobs Finished; status = PASSED, However Inspection must be performed before merge can occur... |
Thanks @jhux2 for fixing the dashboard error! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks fine to me. I have one minor comment about a variable name, but it's not enough to block this.
LO filled_block = 0; | ||
for (LO p_i=0; p_i<offset_p_max-offset_p; ++p_i) { | ||
auto bcol_GID = localPointColMap.getGlobalElement(pointColind(offset_p + p_i))/blockSize; | ||
auto lcol_GID = localMeshColMap.getLocalElement(bcol_GID); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is lcol_GID
a local ID? If so, would it be better to call it lcol_LID
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it was supposed to be bcol_LID
good catch!
Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - SUCCESS: The last commit to this Pull Request has been INSPECTED AND APPROVED by [ jhux2 ]! |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Pull Request will be Automerged |
Merge on Pull Request# 12914: IS A SUCCESS - Pull Request successfully merged |
Thanks for the review @jhux2 ! |
@trilinos/tpetra
@jhux2
This PR fixes the pts->block conversion by using GIDs instead of relying on local IDs.