Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Classify revisions currently in Software-restructuring proposal #12

Draft
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* ucoProject/UCO#596

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2024 14:02
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist requested a review from a team as a code owner June 7, 2024 14:02
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merge conflicts addressed.

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

Setting to Draft, pending updates posted yesterday.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as draft October 25, 2024 16:08
This patch leaves one incompletely-typed class, `ServicePack`, pending
discussion.

References:
* ucoProject/UCO#596
* ucoProject/UCO@faae89b

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's currently at least one class where I was uncertain what gufo:Type should apply. I made some other guesses at where gufo:Kind would go that are probably worth a discussion (Task and Process).

ajnelson-nist and others added 5 commits November 6, 2024 09:18
This patch is known to not pass CI due to an already-existing and
unresolved modeling question on ServicePack.

References:
* ucoProject/UCO#596 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Sean Barnum <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2024 14:36
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as draft November 12, 2024 14:37
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

Apologies, a discussion update occurred last week, reverting to Draft.

…dividual

Thanks to @sbarnum for discussion leading to ServicePack's motion.

Thanks to @plbt5 for discussion leading to the FunctionalComplex
alignment.

No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* ucoProject/UCO#596 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant