-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Classify revisions currently in Software-restructuring proposal #12
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
No effects were observed on Make-managed files. References: * ucoProject/UCO#596 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
This PR is ready for review and merge. |
Merge conflicts addressed. |
Setting to Draft, pending updates posted yesterday. |
This patch leaves one incompletely-typed class, `ServicePack`, pending discussion. References: * ucoProject/UCO#596 * ucoProject/UCO@faae89b Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
There's currently at least one class where I was uncertain what |
This patch is known to not pass CI due to an already-existing and unresolved modeling question on ServicePack. References: * ucoProject/UCO#596 (comment) Co-authored-by: Sean Barnum <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files. Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
This PR is ready for review and merge. |
Apologies, a discussion update occurred last week, reverting to Draft. |
…dividual Thanks to @sbarnum for discussion leading to ServicePack's motion. Thanks to @plbt5 for discussion leading to the FunctionalComplex alignment. No effects were observed on Make-managed files. References: * ucoProject/UCO#596 (comment) Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
No description provided.