Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UFS-SRW v3.0.0 SciDoc updates #1863

Closed

Conversation

grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@grantfirl grantfirl commented Aug 11, 2023

PR Author Checklist:

  • I have linked PR's from all sub-components involved in section below.
  • I am confirming reviews are completed in ALL sub-component PR's.
  • I have run the full RT suite on either Hera/Cheyenne AND have attached the log to this PR below this line:
    • LOG: I ran full RT on Hera and a couple of tests initially failed but passed with a second run, so all tests pass. I can attach partial success log and 2 repeated test logs if necessary.
  • I have added the list of all failed regression tests to "Anticipated changes" section.
  • I have filled out all sections of the template.

Description

This PR updates the scientific documentation in the CCPP physics for UFS-SRW App v3.0.0 release. This should be code comments and text files only and should not have any effect on model results.

Linked Issues and Pull Requests

Associated UFSWM Issue to close

Closes ufs-community/ccpp-physics#96

Subcomponent Pull Requests

NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#685
ufs-community/ccpp-physics#91

Blocking Dependencies

Depends on subcomponent PRs:
NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#685
ufs-community/ccpp-physics#91

Subcomponents involved:

  • AQM
  • CDEPS
  • CICE
  • CMEPS
  • CMakeModules
  • FV3
  • GOCART
  • HYCOM
  • MOM6
  • NOAHMP
  • WW3
  • stochastic_physics
  • none

Anticipated Changes

Input data

  • No changes are expected to input data.
  • Changes are expected to input data:
    • New input data.
    • Updated input data.

Regression Tests:

  • No changes are expected to any regression test.
  • Changes are expected to the following tests:
Tests effected by changes in this PR:

Libraries

  • Not Needed
  • Needed
    • Create separate issue in JCSDA/spack-stack asking for update to library. Include library name, library version.
    • Add issue link from JCSDA/spack-stack following this item
Code Managers Log
  • This PR is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR.
  • Move new/updated input data on RDHPCS Hera and propagate input data changes to all supported systems.
    • N/A

Testing Log:

  • RDHPCS
    • Hera
    • Orion
    • Jet
    • Gaea
    • Cheyenne
  • WCOSS2
    • Dogwood/Cactus
    • Acorn
  • CI
    • Completed
  • opnReqTest
    • N/A
    • Log attached to comment

@FernandoAndrade-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @grantfirl, I see you left a comment in the template that you had Hera RT running. Could you attach the Hera log results here?

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

It's just doc update. I don't think we need full regression test. @grantfirl do you think doc update files can be combined to Sam's PR ufs-community/ccpp-physics#92 ? We will start working on Sam's #1844 today.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It's just doc update. I don't think we need full regression test. @grantfirl do you think doc update files can be combined to Sam's PR ufs-community/ccpp-physics#92 ? We will start working on Sam's #1844 today.

Yes, I think that it's fine to combine. @SamuelTrahanNOAA Do you mind pulling mkavulich:srw300_scidoc_noimages into your SamuelTrahanNOAA:tanya-fix-20230724 branch and pushing for testing purposes?

@FernandoAndrade-NOAA Thanks for the reminder. I just checked the log file on the test that I ran on Hera and it actually had 2 failures (see below). Was there a known issue with these tests or with baselines last week? If not, I can rerun these tests to verify.

FAILED TESTS:
049 merra2_thompson_intel failed in check_result
merra2_thompson_intel 049 failed in run_test
180 atmaero_control_p8_rad_micro_intel failed in check_result
atmaero_control_p8_rad_micro_intel 180 failed in run_test

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I've updated all of the branches from ufs-weather-model down (locally -- haven't pushed anything yet) and am rerunning those couple tests on Hera to see if it was a glitch. This is more for my own curiosity than anything. Looking at the changes in ccpp-physics there is no way it should affect anything...

@zach1221
Copy link
Collaborator

I've updated all of the branches from ufs-weather-model down (locally -- haven't pushed anything yet) and am rerunning those couple tests on Hera to see if it was a glitch. This is more for my own curiosity than anything. Looking at the changes in ccpp-physics there is no way it should affect anything...

@grantfirl there's no issues with the below tests that I'm aware of on Hera. Please let us know how your re-testing goes.
049 merra2_thompson_intel failed in check_result
merra2_thompson_intel 049 failed in run_test
180 atmaero_control_p8_rad_micro_intel failed in check_result
atmaero_control_p8_rad_micro_intel 180 failed in run_test

@FernandoAndrade-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

FernandoAndrade-NOAA commented Aug 18, 2023

It's just doc update. I don't think we need full regression test. @grantfirl do you think doc update files can be combined to Sam's PR ufs-community/ccpp-physics#92 ? We will start working on Sam's #1844 today.

Yes, I think that it's fine to combine. @SamuelTrahanNOAA Do you mind pulling mkavulich:srw300_scidoc_noimages into your SamuelTrahanNOAA:tanya-fix-20230724 branch and pushing for testing purposes?

I've asked the CCPP sub pr for additional assigned reviewer approval and to sync up as well since it seems it's behind compared to the ufs/dev branch. It looks like Sam's will need syncing as well.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I've updated all of the branches from ufs-weather-model down (locally -- haven't pushed anything yet) and am rerunning those couple tests on Hera to see if it was a glitch. This is more for my own curiosity than anything. Looking at the changes in ccpp-physics there is no way it should affect anything...

@grantfirl there's no issues with the below tests that I'm aware of on Hera. Please let us know how your re-testing goes. 049 merra2_thompson_intel failed in check_result merra2_thompson_intel 049 failed in run_test 180 atmaero_control_p8_rad_micro_intel failed in check_result atmaero_control_p8_rad_micro_intel 180 failed in run_test

With all updated code, the tests pass on Hera just fine. I'm guessing it was a full disc space allocation issue since my first retest failed compilation due to lack of space.

@FernandoAndrade-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds good, thanks for syncing up the CCPP sub pr! Please go ahead and sync up for the other components / resolve conflicts in this PR just to avoid any potential issues with combining

@zach1221
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this PR as the combined PR #1844 has been merged.

@zach1221 zach1221 closed this Aug 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update scientific documentation for the UFS-SRW App v3.0.0 release
4 participants