Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Embed key into dict entry #541
Embed key into dict entry #541
Changes from 5 commits
2610832
0936730
f4c54c9
a56e2c9
029917f
3c7d958
7801c7e
9958967
e714f2c
4d30109
88c7a4d
417b15a
e00a633
d9d1cd3
32cafc6
67872b1
1c7fc68
c61bd70
ce76a16
11400e2
4ca43ce
825c82f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The way
dictEntry
is used has no type safety. Admittedly, this is not a new issue but the addition ofembeddedDictEntry
is making it worse. The following code path looks problematic to me. can you please double check?setGenericComamd() -> setKey() -> dbAdd() -> dbAddInsternal() -> kvstoreDictSetKey() -> dictSetKey()
I don't see
dictSetKey
getting patched to handle this new embedded dict entry.I would suggest making
dictEntry
an opaque struct next and force every function go through an inline accessor function/macro. I think this is the only certain way to ensure we don't accidentally use the wrong data type.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't the dictEntry already opaque?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not in dict.c.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess I don't agree it should be opaque in dict.c. It seems like a very small number of actual touch points we actually have to make sure are correct. We could even reduce the number. I'm not sure making it opaque will help all that much.Discussed offline, Ping has a separate proposal for adding guardrails that he will publish.