Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add util tag in unit-test name of util to be consistent with other tests and rename tempfile name to valkey-recliam-cache-test #549

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: unstable
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Shivshankar-Reddy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.20%. Comparing base (f927565) to head (473e233).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           unstable     #549      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     70.23%   70.20%   -0.03%     
============================================
  Files           109      109              
  Lines         59955    59955              
============================================
- Hits          42110    42093      -17     
- Misses        17845    17862      +17     

see 13 files with indirect coverage changes

@@ -268,13 +268,13 @@ static int cache_exist(int fd) {
}
#endif

int test_reclaimFilePageCache(int argc, char **argv, int flags) {
int test_utilReclaimFilePageCache(int argc, char **argv, int flags) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if I buy this. We don't really have a naming convention here. If you want to define a naming convention, can you document it in the readme?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unknowingly we all followed the format but only one file's test cases were missed. As you suggested, updated readme file content (Not added specific block for naming convetion). I hope changed content is enough to follow, Please let me know if we need to have a seperate block for naming conventions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants