Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update Django to 4.2 #610

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

Update Django to 4.2 #610

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

hugobessa
Copy link
Contributor

@hugobessa hugobessa commented Aug 14, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Description

  • Updates django-js-reverse to 0.10.2 (it starts supporting Django 4+)
  • Updates Django to 4.2

Motivation and Context

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Steps to reproduce (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires documentation updates.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • My change requires dependencies updates.
  • I have updated the dependencies accordingly.

fjsj
fjsj approved these changes Aug 15, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@fjsj fjsj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but please double-check the change by starting a project from scratch

@hugobessa hugobessa merged commit 90fd9b9 into master Sep 5, 2023
2 checks passed
@hugobessa hugobessa deleted the update-django branch September 5, 2023 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fjsj fjsj fjsj approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@hugobessa @fjsj