-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
aspell-el added #16043
aspell-el added #16043
Conversation
Thanks for your contribution! Please run
When you update your PR, please make sure to commit your changes via |
# This is copy of aspell's site | ||
# https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/0index.html | ||
# | ||
# Project's page: http://www.elspell.gr/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be put into homepage.
# | ||
pkgname=aspell-el | ||
version=0.08 | ||
revision=0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Revision means which time same version of package is built in Void, so distfiles can't depend on it. For avoiding dash in version, do like in libcli template.
hostmakedepends="aspell-devel" | ||
short_desc="Greek dictionary for aspell" | ||
maintainer="Steve Stavropoulos <[email protected]>" | ||
license="GPL-2.0-or-later" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
-only
depends="aspell" | ||
hostmakedepends="aspell-devel" | ||
short_desc="Greek dictionary for aspell" | ||
maintainer="Steve Stavropoulos <[email protected]>" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This field is for name of packager, rather than name of author.
Thank you both of you. |
@nereusx: Well, are you already aware of the CONTRIBUTING, which is referenced in this repo's README? If so, do you have any suggestions for how it could be improved? |
Similarly, Manual.md is of great value. |
Well, it is useful, but needs work; less text more examples. You should starting with what ppl had to read already. Also add this in the must read https://github.com/iiitkottayam/first-contribution or something better. While I did already contributions on other projects like learnxiny it was simpliest, there are features and problems of git that I meet in this project since it has more traffic. You know the solutions, I ll have to search... The Manual.md has also "missing parts" and its a bit hard to understand, for example why to use vman since I have vinstall? how to include a Makefile to original package so to do my job easy as already know, well there are more questions on this but you didn't ask. Now, I am retired with health issues, but many years ago I was create the smallbasic mostly for PalmOS (from 2004 I retired from the project). I found cvs was more smart in simple task like add a directory without mess everything :P but that I has to say is you need a forum for each subporject (like the documentation). That worked excellent for me. Also there is a wiki-void but link is not in the main site, why? how do you expect ppl to find this? The void site need to be rewritten with the major resources on the top. Find easy is a mesaure for sites quality you know... well at least it was. That are my comments, I am happy with your works guys, I just comment for better results. |
Thanks for your feedback! i'm actually new to Void myself: i've only just started contributing, primarily in the area of documentation (though i've also added a package,
Could you please point to the place where
This is already in place: see the projects listed at https://github.com/void-linux/, amongst which is the void-docs project, which has its own issue tracker.
This is deliberate, as the wiki is deprecated; see issue #104 in the void-docs repo. i agree that whilst the wiki is still online and visible to search engines, it would be good to let people know that it should no longer be used. Myself and @bobertlo have made some suggestions about this (here and here), but as Void is a volunteer-run project, it relies on the relevant Void devs having the time and space to address these suggestions.
Well, the navigation bar at the top of the Void home page has a "Documentation" entry which links to https://docs.voidlinux.org/; and, yeah, the wiki is not listed alongside it because the wiki is no longer considered an official resource. |
Also there are plenty of examples, just about 7191 as I type this. They're conveniently located in the srcpkgs/ directory of this very repo. |
@flexibeast: About xbump "manual": Guys the most people does not know even how the mouse works. Every author of documentation has to keep this in his mind. Of course he dont need to explain the mouse, but asking to read a manual that is bad even for those who wrote, isnt good. Just mention what commands needed and how to use them... then you can add a link to original man page... Back in smallbasic project, sourceforge had al ready did tickets and forums, but no, no one used (except 2-3 ppl). The reason it wasn;t attractive to visitors and users to involve, so I just add a phpBB forum, and wow was filled with ppl in 1-2 months commenting, asking and exchange scripts. @the-maldridge: |
@nereusx:
Okay, thanks. (Although i wasn't the one that wrote CONTRIBUTING.) i'll prepare a PR to have CONTRIBUTING elaborate on how to use
It certainly makes sense to me, though i admit English is my native language. Still, i agree it could do with more details - i'll see what i can do.
Well, when i prepared my first package, i read CONTRIBUTING and found that it seemed to provide all the necessary information, as shown by the fact that the PR to which i referred in my previous comment did not require any further changes before it was merged.
Okay, but there are a couple of things to keep in mind here:
But why is your time as a volunteer inherently more valuable than the time of the volunteer Void devs? When i packaged
|
Yes, github interface is simple and nice. I prefer it too. Microsoft sure did bad impact but still is nonsense to change server... Well I have a copy to my disks too, you know. The meaning of all this is just make it simple and nice and ppl will come. Your work to write tutorials/manuals its very important, and there are no many ppl that had the courage to do it. Try to keep ppl's interest and show them "oh but is too simple" is the key of success for me. Unfortunately in most cases I didn't hear myself and write very detailed docs :)
Going something wrong with C, is strong reason to change distro. I wont like to live the decade of 90s again! |
Be polite, it is my first try ;)