chore: upgrade cspell

[benmccann]

This PR contains a:

• bugfix
• new feature
• code refactor
• test update
• typo fix
• metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

adds tinyglobby to the included dictionary, which is necessary for #788

Breaking Changes

Additional Info

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.48%. Comparing base (a20dedd) to head (1558472).
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #790      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.55%   91.48%   +0.92%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         413      411       -2     
  Branches      120      119       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits          374      376       +2     
+ Misses         38       34       -4     
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[snitin315]

adds tinyglobby to the included dictionary,

How is this related to #788? Can't we just add tinyglobby here during migration?

[benmccann]

How is this related to #788?

The word tinyglobby must be in the dictionary or the lint job for spell checking will fail. The latest version of cspell has it included

Can't we just add tinyglobby here during migration?

That would probably work too. Is it simpler than this solution though? Presumably we'll update to the latest cspell eventually, so why not do that alone instead of doing it and also maintaining it in a separate list?