Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a problem with faiss simdlib use v2 #155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2023

Conversation

chasingegg
Copy link
Collaborator

Try fix #149 cc @alexanderguzhva
/kind bug

Signed-off-by: chasingegg <[email protected]>
@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot added the kind/bug This PR is a bug fix label Oct 17, 2023
@sre-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chasingegg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@alexanderguzhva
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm
I could not crash the unit tests :)

@chasingegg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Presburger help try this patch to verify if it is ok under your settings.

@chasingegg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-e2e

@chasingegg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/hold

@alexanderguzhva
Copy link
Collaborator

Something stopped making sense to me. The performance of SCANN should be the same, no matter whether I use -mfma -mavx2 for building faiss, right? But it is different.
/hold

@alexanderguzhva
Copy link
Collaborator

/unhold

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot merged commit 1dc6e21 into zilliztech:main Oct 18, 2023
@chasingegg chasingegg deleted the fix-knowhere-build branch October 18, 2023 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Faiss] some issues in Faiss::simdlib after #144
3 participants